AI Governance: A Critical Component of Corporate ESG Initiatives
Helping organizations navigate the often-challenging implementation of Responsible AI as part of ESG efforts
What You Don't Know About the G in ESG and Why it Matters
I recently had the pleasure of addressing the global FICO community from the mainstage of FICO World 22. I spoke about governance, the ‘G’ in corporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) programs. Joining me onstage for the discussion was Cortnie Abercrombie, CEO of AI Truth and author of “What You Don’t Know: AI’s Unseen Influence on Your Life and How to Take Back Control.” Below we recount some of the key discussion points from our dialogue, helping organizations navigate the often-challenging implementation process of corporate environmental, social and governance (ESG) programs.
Scott: There are lots of Board-level conversations about ESG, a topic of critical importance. From your perspective, why is governance critical when it comes to artificial intelligence? Why is AI governance a Board-level conversation?
Cortnie: Boards of Directors care about the strategy of the company, the direction it’s taking and the risk. They build corporate policies to help govern everything and make sure that the organization stays on the right track. So, if you're building artificial intelligence capabilities or any kind of machine learning capabilities on anything less than quality or substandard as an initiative, then it’s strategy snake oil. When you're talking about AI and machine learning, these technologies are being used to achieve a strategic advantage for the organization and you don't want that to be built on snake oil, right?
Scott: Absolutely not, no snake oil here! But it’s a big challenge. When we talk about the term AI, what is actually behind the AI? How do we have proof of it working? And more importantly, how can we make sure that we monitor AI systems and understand how it's going to behave in production, before it harms people. That’s really, critically important. Cortnie, what’s your view on the most critical component of AI-related governance? It's a complex topic.
ESG Initiatives: Trust Needs to be Sustainable When it Comes to AI Systems
Cortnie: Trust. As a society right now, I don’t think there are many entities in our lives that we trust. We don't trust politics, media, Big Tech or even our neighbors. How are you going to build tech that someone can trust in a trustless environment? You're going to have to find a way to show people the technologies, the positive impacts and answer the question, “Why I should trust this, and how it can be explained to me?”
Scott: When we survey our customers, trust is one of the topics that they put it at the very top of the list of what they respect, and they like about FICO. Trust is, not granted, it's earned, and it's continually earned. It's something that we take very seriously.
Cortnie: Incidentally, before I even trusted Scott, I used my initiative to check my FICO score online and looked to see if I agreed with it, because I am a “show me” kind of person and a very big skeptic. When I think of which organizations are doing really great things in terms of explainability and transparency, I love the FICO approach.
Scott: That is great, Cortnie. When we explore how to establish trust, transparency is key. For a consumer to have trust, they need to understand the decision, and also to have an understanding of how to improve an outcome, or why they have that outcome. So, transparency is one of the core tenets of success when people are correctly implementing AI governance.
Catch the rest of Scott and Cortnie’s Talk on YouTube, where they steered their ESG governance conversation past transparency and on to self-driving cars, the importance of support for AI governance at the highest levels of an organization, model governance ‘in the wild,’ what happens when data scientists’ egos run amok, using blockchain to codify model decisions, and more.
How FICO Can Help You With AI Governance To Meet Responsible AI and ESG Goals
- Watch a video interview by “CXO Talk” with Scott Zoldi on AI governance and AI ethics principles and why data scientists and business leaders need to closely manage the AI systems that help drive corporate initiatives.
- Explore our State of “Responsible AI:2021” report, which polled 100 C-level leaders on how they are ensuring AI is used ethically, responsibly, securely and in their customers’ best interests.
- Read our Artificial Intelligence Playbook, which offers a step-by-step guide for achieving responsible AI.
Follow me on LinkedIn and Twitter @ScottZoldi to see my latest thoughts on Responsible AI, AI governance, ESG, machine learning and data science.
Popular Posts
Average U.S. FICO® Score at 716, Indicating Improvement in Consumer Credit Behaviors Despite Pandemic
The FICO Score is a broad-based, independent standard measure of credit risk
Read more
The GSE Data Is Public. Here's What It Shows About Credit Score Modernization.
Independent Milliman analysis of GSE historical data confirms what anyone can now verify directly: FICO® Score 10T is the most predictive score.
Read more
FICO® Score High Achievers: Is Age the Only Factor?
<p>FICO’s latest research on <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/us-credit-quality-rising-the-beat-goes-on/" target="_blank">national FICO® Score distribution</a> shows that US credit quality continues to trend upwards, with an increasing number of consumers scoring in the highest scores ranges. Given that, we decided it was time to refresh our study on “<a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/infographic-what-does-a-high-credit-scorer-look-like/" target="_blank">FICO® Score high achievers</a>,” where we examine the credit behavioural profiles of consumers with higher credit scores.</p> <p>As expected, our latest study showed that older people generally have higher scores, as has been the case in our <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/age-before-beauty-credit-worthiness-before-youth/" target="_blank">past research</a>. This is largely because they have trade lines that have been open longer, which leads to higher scores (assuming the trade lines are in good standing and all other things equal). The most credit savvy among you will remember that length of credit history accounts for roughly 15% of the overall <a href="http://www.myfico.com/CreditEducation/WhatsInYourScore.aspx" target="_blank">FICO® Score calculation</a>.</p> <p>But for younger consumers, it isn’t too helpful to say, “just wait until you are 50 years old, and that will fix things!” Thus, I decided to dive deeper with our analysis, including looking at the credit behavioural characteristics of younger consumers with high FICO® Scores.</p> <p>In this analysis, I looked at credit characteristics for the two highest score bands, 750-799 and 800-850, which have about 16% and 23% of the population, respectively. I further broke this down by looking at the characteristics of the youngest 15% in each group, which occurs at age 29 for the 750-799 group and 43 for the 800-850. We used FICO<strong>®</strong> Score 9 for our analysis, and examined typical variables of the categories that go into the make-up of the score.</p> <p><a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-29367" src="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png" alt="fico-score-high-achiever-table" width="715" height="747" /></a></p> <p>Since there’s a lot to dissect in this chart, I’ll highlight a few findings that struck me: <ul> <li><strong>Credit history.</strong> Higher scores are undoubtedly associated with a longer time on file. What’s striking is the higher average time on file for the 800+ group, both overall and for revolving accounts (the most common trade line). Clearly, it helps to start credit use early in life – but that’s not the sole determining factor for high scoring. The younger cohorts in both the 800+ and 750-799 groups have time on file medians significantly less than their older counterparts.</li> <li><strong>New credit.</strong> High credit scorers do, in fact, pursue new credit. We see little variation in months since last trade line opening and last inquiry among all groups observed.</li> <li><strong>Pay on time.</strong> As you might expect, the further in the past the delinquency, the higher the score – and that’s <u>if</u> a delinquency ever happened. 95% of the 800+ people and 72% of the 750-799 group have never been delinquent, which is a striking contrast to the 57% for the total population. The percentages for the younger groups are even higher, especially so for the 750-799ers. Collection items are also scarce for these high scorers. While 23% of the national population have collection items greater than $99, the figures are only 0.5% for the 800+ group and 3% for the 750-799 group. It is clear that, in conjunction with starting a credit file early, paying on time is a key trait of the FICO® Score high achiever.</li> <li><strong>Balance and utilization.</strong> Finally, we look at how credit is being used, focusing on revolving product use. (Since most people only have one mortgage or one auto loan, variation in instalment product figures is minimal and driven by payment history, which is near perfect for high scorers, as we’ve seen.) FICO® Score high achievers tend to have more open revolving accounts. While the % active trades and utilization are generally lower, by no means do high scorers avoid the use of credit products. What drives the difference here is the amount of <u>available</u> revolving credit utilized. The 800+ group is roughly 1/4 of the national median, both in total and on their highest utilized card; they also have lower balances and more cards<em>. </em>The 750-799 group is more active and higher utilized, but still only at 2/3 of the national figures. The young 750-799 group compensate with lower revolving balances and, as a result, lower utilization, which is in line with what we see for the 800+ group.</li> <li><strong>Benchmarks.</strong> I’d like to point out that while this study provides good benchmarks of the typical credit traits of the FICO® Score high achiever, individual credit profiles will vary widely. And keep in mind that when we sort groups of consumers as a whole by different behaviours, some results may look superficially odd. For example, the 800+ band has a longer median average open account time (128 months) than average revolving months on file (140 months).</li> </ul> So, what do we conclude? A huge takeaway is that high scorers don’t have too much in the way of serious delinquencies and negative public record data.</p> <p>In most respects, the young 800+ people are like their peer group. They really only differ markedly in their shorter credit history and higher non-mortgage balance, both of which are a function of life stage. Our results show that you don’t have to be a credit product hermit; these high scorers have more credit cards. The takeaway is to start credit activity early and maintain well-managed and moderate usage.</p> <p>In many ways, the young 750-799 people are more interesting because their age profile is much younger. Their credit characteristics differ more from their peer group, particularly in terms of length of credit history. They compensate by having almost pristine credit records and lower balances.</p> <p>Ultimately, 39% of US consumers are FICO® Score high achievers, which they accomplish by following common-sense credit practices. It ain’t rocket science!</p>
Read moreTake the next step
Connect with FICO for answers to all your product and solution questions. Interested in becoming a business partner? Contact us to learn more. We look forward to hearing from you.