AI Predictions 2020: Artificial Intelligence Grows Up
Artificial Intelligence is encountering new demands in the areas of responsibility, advocacy and regulation.
For the past couple of years artificial intelligence (AI) has been the enfant terrible of the business world, a technology full of unconventional and controversial behavior that has shocked, provoked and enchanted audiences worldwide. In 2020, that’s all going to change. In 2020, I predict that AI is going to grow up, encountering new demands in the areas of responsibility, advocacy and regulation.
Beyond Ethical AI: Responsible AI
For the past few years I’ve been working hard on new data science patents, pushing AI technology to be more defensive, explainable and ethical. In 2020, driven by the ever-rising onslaught of new AI applications—coupled with the fact regulation around AI explainability, transparence and ethics is still emerging—there will be higher expectations for responsible AI systems.
Medical devices provide an obvious analog. A medical device such as a heart pacemaker that is rushed to market may be poorly or negligently designed. If people using that device are harmed, there would be liability; the company providing it could be sued by individuals or groups if a lack of rigor and/or reasonable effort was proven.
Along those lines, there will be a more punitive response for companies that consider explainable, ethical AI to be optional. “Oops! We’ve made a mistake with an algorithm and it’s having a harmful effect,” will no longer be interesting news stories of AI gone rogue, but instead a call to action.
I predict that in 2020, AI insurance will become available; companies will look to insure their AI algorithms from liability lawsuits. Using blockchain or other means for auditable model development and model governance will become essential in demonstrating due diligence in building, explaining and testing AI models.
AI advocacy groups will fight back
What effects of AI may be harmful? Think about someone being denied rightful entry to a country due to inaccurate facial recognition. Or misdiagnosed by disease-seeking robotic technology. Or denied access to a loan because a new type of credit score on non-causal features rates them poorly. Or being incorrectly blamed as the cause of an auto accident by the insurance company mobile app loaded onto their phone. What rights do humans have when AI have done them wrong?
Already there is all manner of ways that people are treated unfairly in our society, with advocacy groups to match. With AI advocacy, there may be a different construct, because consumers and their advocacy groups will demand access to the information and process on which the AI system made its decision. AI advocacy will provide empowerment, but it also may drive significant debates between AI experts to interpret and triage the data, model development process, and implementation.
AI advocacy is a radical idea, but a similar concept has already been in place with the FICO® Score; for more than 30 years consumers have had access to their FICO Score and the credit bureau reports it informs. If someone is denied credit, the would-be issuer is required to provide an explanation as to why; if a consumer feels that an item(s) on a credit bureau report is inaccurate they can file a dispute to request its investigation and removal.
AI governance
Leaders in many industries hold a blanket, negative view that government regulation is an inhibitor of innovation. With AI, this bias couldn’t be anything further than the truth. Regulators and legislators are trying to protect consumers from the negative effects of technology (in reality, the human creators that misuse AI/ML) with the EU’s General Data Protection Rule, the California Consumer Privacy Act and others. However, these groups often are making demands of technology about which they have little understanding.
Granted, at the opposite end of the scale, there are the companies that clasp their metaphorical hands and say, “We are ethical; we will do no evil with your data,” although, without a standard of accountability, we won’t know for sure. For both of these extremes, and everything in between, in 2020 I predict we will see the rise of international standards to define a framework for safe and trusted AI, because regulation keeps companies honest. And I hope to see AI experts support and drive regulation of the industry, to ensure fairness and inculcate responsibility.
Experience matters
As AI grows to be a pervasive technology, there is little trust of the morals and ethics of many companies that use it. As a data scientist, that is disheartening, and not exactly what I envisioned blogging about when I started my AI Predictions blogs in 2016. However, as modern society discovers more about the damage that can be done by misuse of artificial intelligence, it’s clear that experience, not “move fast and break things” matters. It’s time for AI to grow up.
Follow me now, and in 2020, on Twitter @ScottZoldi.
Popular Posts
Average U.S. FICO® Score at 716, Indicating Improvement in Consumer Credit Behaviors Despite Pandemic
The FICO Score is a broad-based, independent standard measure of credit risk
Read more
The GSE Data Is Public. Here's What It Shows About Credit Score Modernization.
Independent Milliman analysis of GSE historical data confirms what anyone can now verify directly: FICO® Score 10T is the most predictive score.
Read more
FICO® Score High Achievers: Is Age the Only Factor?
<p>FICO’s latest research on <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/us-credit-quality-rising-the-beat-goes-on/" target="_blank">national FICO® Score distribution</a> shows that US credit quality continues to trend upwards, with an increasing number of consumers scoring in the highest scores ranges. Given that, we decided it was time to refresh our study on “<a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/infographic-what-does-a-high-credit-scorer-look-like/" target="_blank">FICO® Score high achievers</a>,” where we examine the credit behavioural profiles of consumers with higher credit scores.</p> <p>As expected, our latest study showed that older people generally have higher scores, as has been the case in our <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/age-before-beauty-credit-worthiness-before-youth/" target="_blank">past research</a>. This is largely because they have trade lines that have been open longer, which leads to higher scores (assuming the trade lines are in good standing and all other things equal). The most credit savvy among you will remember that length of credit history accounts for roughly 15% of the overall <a href="http://www.myfico.com/CreditEducation/WhatsInYourScore.aspx" target="_blank">FICO® Score calculation</a>.</p> <p>But for younger consumers, it isn’t too helpful to say, “just wait until you are 50 years old, and that will fix things!” Thus, I decided to dive deeper with our analysis, including looking at the credit behavioural characteristics of younger consumers with high FICO® Scores.</p> <p>In this analysis, I looked at credit characteristics for the two highest score bands, 750-799 and 800-850, which have about 16% and 23% of the population, respectively. I further broke this down by looking at the characteristics of the youngest 15% in each group, which occurs at age 29 for the 750-799 group and 43 for the 800-850. We used FICO<strong>®</strong> Score 9 for our analysis, and examined typical variables of the categories that go into the make-up of the score.</p> <p><a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-29367" src="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png" alt="fico-score-high-achiever-table" width="715" height="747" /></a></p> <p>Since there’s a lot to dissect in this chart, I’ll highlight a few findings that struck me: <ul> <li><strong>Credit history.</strong> Higher scores are undoubtedly associated with a longer time on file. What’s striking is the higher average time on file for the 800+ group, both overall and for revolving accounts (the most common trade line). Clearly, it helps to start credit use early in life – but that’s not the sole determining factor for high scoring. The younger cohorts in both the 800+ and 750-799 groups have time on file medians significantly less than their older counterparts.</li> <li><strong>New credit.</strong> High credit scorers do, in fact, pursue new credit. We see little variation in months since last trade line opening and last inquiry among all groups observed.</li> <li><strong>Pay on time.</strong> As you might expect, the further in the past the delinquency, the higher the score – and that’s <u>if</u> a delinquency ever happened. 95% of the 800+ people and 72% of the 750-799 group have never been delinquent, which is a striking contrast to the 57% for the total population. The percentages for the younger groups are even higher, especially so for the 750-799ers. Collection items are also scarce for these high scorers. While 23% of the national population have collection items greater than $99, the figures are only 0.5% for the 800+ group and 3% for the 750-799 group. It is clear that, in conjunction with starting a credit file early, paying on time is a key trait of the FICO® Score high achiever.</li> <li><strong>Balance and utilization.</strong> Finally, we look at how credit is being used, focusing on revolving product use. (Since most people only have one mortgage or one auto loan, variation in instalment product figures is minimal and driven by payment history, which is near perfect for high scorers, as we’ve seen.) FICO® Score high achievers tend to have more open revolving accounts. While the % active trades and utilization are generally lower, by no means do high scorers avoid the use of credit products. What drives the difference here is the amount of <u>available</u> revolving credit utilized. The 800+ group is roughly 1/4 of the national median, both in total and on their highest utilized card; they also have lower balances and more cards<em>. </em>The 750-799 group is more active and higher utilized, but still only at 2/3 of the national figures. The young 750-799 group compensate with lower revolving balances and, as a result, lower utilization, which is in line with what we see for the 800+ group.</li> <li><strong>Benchmarks.</strong> I’d like to point out that while this study provides good benchmarks of the typical credit traits of the FICO® Score high achiever, individual credit profiles will vary widely. And keep in mind that when we sort groups of consumers as a whole by different behaviours, some results may look superficially odd. For example, the 800+ band has a longer median average open account time (128 months) than average revolving months on file (140 months).</li> </ul> So, what do we conclude? A huge takeaway is that high scorers don’t have too much in the way of serious delinquencies and negative public record data.</p> <p>In most respects, the young 800+ people are like their peer group. They really only differ markedly in their shorter credit history and higher non-mortgage balance, both of which are a function of life stage. Our results show that you don’t have to be a credit product hermit; these high scorers have more credit cards. The takeaway is to start credit activity early and maintain well-managed and moderate usage.</p> <p>In many ways, the young 750-799 people are more interesting because their age profile is much younger. Their credit characteristics differ more from their peer group, particularly in terms of length of credit history. They compensate by having almost pristine credit records and lower balances.</p> <p>Ultimately, 39% of US consumers are FICO® Score high achievers, which they accomplish by following common-sense credit practices. It ain’t rocket science!</p>
Read moreTake the next step
Connect with FICO for answers to all your product and solution questions. Interested in becoming a business partner? Contact us to learn more. We look forward to hearing from you.