Analytics or Human Experience? The Answer is Both
How analytics can supplement and enhance efficiencies in Collections
As agencies consider using analytics to enhance their collection capabilities, one of the topics which often comes up is whether analytics can replace administrators in the effective operation of their departments. My answer is that there is no replacement for the decades of experience that administrators have. Analytics is a tool that allows strong managers to supplement and enhance their experience, and work in concert to further enhance their operations. It does not mean losing control. Rather it means gaining more control.
Defining Analytics
Analytics can mean different things to different people, so it is important to start with a common definition. In this context, analytics refers to mathematically derived predictive models which help inform automated decisions that can enhance the performance results of your operations. At the most basic level, imagine it is fifteen minutes before the end of your business day. A collector has time to make one more call and has many possible cases that he or she could contact. A predictive model scores the cases and selects the case with the highest potential to be contacted. Even if a collector might select the same case after careful review of all the options, the predictive model allows the collector to work the best case without spending the time to review all their options.
Utilizing a predictive model does not mean that the manager loses control or gives up the ability to create their strategy. Predictive models assist managers to enhance their strategies. For example, while the model may predict an order to work collection cases, the managers must determine the strategy of the workloads which will be pursued, which collector(s) to assign cases to, and the timing and frequency of contacts.
Analytics Provides Fairness
One area where predictive models can support a program is enhancing consistency across the jurisdiction. If a collector is working a case, a model can determine if the case has been assigned for a sufficient period of time, and if it is ready for reassignment, the score model can determine the likely return based on the age. Some cases based on historical experience are unlikely to be collected if they have not had a payment for a period of time. Resources are limited, and while a collector may not want to give up on a case, there may be other consumers which would be a better use of the collector’s time.
However, collector experience should be utilized. Just because a consumer comes back with a high score, does not mean it is guaranteed to be worthwhile. The collector or supervisor could discover information about the consumer that is important in the process which could change the collectability higher or lower than the predictive model suggests.
Predictive models can also support a goal of treating similar taxpayers the same. When an agency relies on staff, even staff with longstanding expertise, then different staff are likely to make different selections. If actions are informed by models, then it is more likely that similar taxpayers will be treated the same, (e.g., timing for specific collection actions, write-off or offer in compromise decisions).
Analytics allows Managers to focus on Policy and Priorities
Predictive models allow you to manage your inventory in a more holistic manner. Managers decide what models are prioritized to maximize overall performance. This could include for example:
- Collection models to determine which cases are most likely to self-cure
- Predictive models to determine the cases most likely to result in increased payment if assigned to a collector
- Predictive models to determine which payment agreements are likely to success
- Predictive models to determine the best timing to pursue activities
Models help you select the best cases. Management still sets the priorities and policies. The analytical models act as a tool to increase overall results. In addition, because the models typically utilize machine learning, they can also adjust their scoring calculations as conditions change.
Change Management Challenges
One important area to consider, is that one of the hardest aspects of incorporating analytics into a collection operation is the associated Change Management. Some managers are fiercely protective of their processes and decision making. They need to understand that utilizing analytics and models is adding another tool into “their” toolbelt. Using scores is not giving up control, but it is taking additional input to enhance their decision making. They set the policy and strategy, and the model scores are a way of automating their goals. Once they see it as their models and their tool, they are more likely to embrace analytics to help their organization.
To learn more about FICO’s capabilities in collections, analytics and communications visit https://www.fico.com/en/products/fico-collection-recovery-models and contact or follow me on LinkedIn at https://www.linkedin.com/in/tedlondon/.
Popular Posts
Average U.S. FICO® Score at 716, Indicating Improvement in Consumer Credit Behaviors Despite Pandemic
The FICO Score is a broad-based, independent standard measure of credit risk
Read more
The GSE Data Is Public. Here's What It Shows About Credit Score Modernization.
Independent Milliman analysis of GSE historical data confirms what anyone can now verify directly: FICO® Score 10T is the most predictive score.
Read more
FICO® Score High Achievers: Is Age the Only Factor?
<p>FICO’s latest research on <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/us-credit-quality-rising-the-beat-goes-on/" target="_blank">national FICO® Score distribution</a> shows that US credit quality continues to trend upwards, with an increasing number of consumers scoring in the highest scores ranges. Given that, we decided it was time to refresh our study on “<a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/infographic-what-does-a-high-credit-scorer-look-like/" target="_blank">FICO® Score high achievers</a>,” where we examine the credit behavioural profiles of consumers with higher credit scores.</p> <p>As expected, our latest study showed that older people generally have higher scores, as has been the case in our <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/age-before-beauty-credit-worthiness-before-youth/" target="_blank">past research</a>. This is largely because they have trade lines that have been open longer, which leads to higher scores (assuming the trade lines are in good standing and all other things equal). The most credit savvy among you will remember that length of credit history accounts for roughly 15% of the overall <a href="http://www.myfico.com/CreditEducation/WhatsInYourScore.aspx" target="_blank">FICO® Score calculation</a>.</p> <p>But for younger consumers, it isn’t too helpful to say, “just wait until you are 50 years old, and that will fix things!” Thus, I decided to dive deeper with our analysis, including looking at the credit behavioural characteristics of younger consumers with high FICO® Scores.</p> <p>In this analysis, I looked at credit characteristics for the two highest score bands, 750-799 and 800-850, which have about 16% and 23% of the population, respectively. I further broke this down by looking at the characteristics of the youngest 15% in each group, which occurs at age 29 for the 750-799 group and 43 for the 800-850. We used FICO<strong>®</strong> Score 9 for our analysis, and examined typical variables of the categories that go into the make-up of the score.</p> <p><a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-29367" src="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png" alt="fico-score-high-achiever-table" width="715" height="747" /></a></p> <p>Since there’s a lot to dissect in this chart, I’ll highlight a few findings that struck me: <ul> <li><strong>Credit history.</strong> Higher scores are undoubtedly associated with a longer time on file. What’s striking is the higher average time on file for the 800+ group, both overall and for revolving accounts (the most common trade line). Clearly, it helps to start credit use early in life – but that’s not the sole determining factor for high scoring. The younger cohorts in both the 800+ and 750-799 groups have time on file medians significantly less than their older counterparts.</li> <li><strong>New credit.</strong> High credit scorers do, in fact, pursue new credit. We see little variation in months since last trade line opening and last inquiry among all groups observed.</li> <li><strong>Pay on time.</strong> As you might expect, the further in the past the delinquency, the higher the score – and that’s <u>if</u> a delinquency ever happened. 95% of the 800+ people and 72% of the 750-799 group have never been delinquent, which is a striking contrast to the 57% for the total population. The percentages for the younger groups are even higher, especially so for the 750-799ers. Collection items are also scarce for these high scorers. While 23% of the national population have collection items greater than $99, the figures are only 0.5% for the 800+ group and 3% for the 750-799 group. It is clear that, in conjunction with starting a credit file early, paying on time is a key trait of the FICO® Score high achiever.</li> <li><strong>Balance and utilization.</strong> Finally, we look at how credit is being used, focusing on revolving product use. (Since most people only have one mortgage or one auto loan, variation in instalment product figures is minimal and driven by payment history, which is near perfect for high scorers, as we’ve seen.) FICO® Score high achievers tend to have more open revolving accounts. While the % active trades and utilization are generally lower, by no means do high scorers avoid the use of credit products. What drives the difference here is the amount of <u>available</u> revolving credit utilized. The 800+ group is roughly 1/4 of the national median, both in total and on their highest utilized card; they also have lower balances and more cards<em>. </em>The 750-799 group is more active and higher utilized, but still only at 2/3 of the national figures. The young 750-799 group compensate with lower revolving balances and, as a result, lower utilization, which is in line with what we see for the 800+ group.</li> <li><strong>Benchmarks.</strong> I’d like to point out that while this study provides good benchmarks of the typical credit traits of the FICO® Score high achiever, individual credit profiles will vary widely. And keep in mind that when we sort groups of consumers as a whole by different behaviours, some results may look superficially odd. For example, the 800+ band has a longer median average open account time (128 months) than average revolving months on file (140 months).</li> </ul> So, what do we conclude? A huge takeaway is that high scorers don’t have too much in the way of serious delinquencies and negative public record data.</p> <p>In most respects, the young 800+ people are like their peer group. They really only differ markedly in their shorter credit history and higher non-mortgage balance, both of which are a function of life stage. Our results show that you don’t have to be a credit product hermit; these high scorers have more credit cards. The takeaway is to start credit activity early and maintain well-managed and moderate usage.</p> <p>In many ways, the young 750-799 people are more interesting because their age profile is much younger. Their credit characteristics differ more from their peer group, particularly in terms of length of credit history. They compensate by having almost pristine credit records and lower balances.</p> <p>Ultimately, 39% of US consumers are FICO® Score high achievers, which they accomplish by following common-sense credit practices. It ain’t rocket science!</p>
Read moreTake the next step
Connect with FICO for answers to all your product and solution questions. Interested in becoming a business partner? Contact us to learn more. We look forward to hearing from you.