“The Art of the Possible” in Promotional Pricing for Deposits: A Precise, Multi-Lever Approach
There are many possibilities for deposit promotions that provide multiple levers to deliver differentiated value for the customer and benefits for the bank.
In my first blog post, we explored the current state and challenges tied to promotional pricing in deposits. Now, let’s investigate the many possibilities for deposit promotions that provide multiple levers to deliver differentiated value for the customer and measurable benefits for the bank.
It’s no surprise that customers have varying perspectives on savings. Some customers are rate-sensitive, while others are more goal-focused. Some may value the satisfaction that comes from a high rate that rewards rigorous saving, while others may be “new savers” that are saving up for a special family vacation.
To reach a diverse set of customer segments, promotional pricing designs require various levers that provide meaningful, differentiated value to the customer. This is the “art” of what is possible in deposit promotional pricing—moving from a common, static design to a multi-faceted approach that is more nuanced, sophisticated, and aligned with customer wants and needs.
You may be asking: does this multi-lever approach really work? Let’s look at an example that most of us can relate to—our precious mobile phones. In their quest to attract customers, mobile phone carriers offer varying promotions, ranging from price-based offers, to 2-for-1 devices, to complimentary bundled services, such as entertainment streaming subscriptions. Multiple offers (or levers) allow carriers to deliver true value to their various customer segments. This allows a mobile carrier to make the “buy” decision about more than just the price. (Seriously, have you seen the price on the new phones?)
Similarly, banks can move beyond the "one-size-fits-all” approach that focuses only on the billboard rate to touting more customer-centric, compelling promotional offers that intelligently target select customer segments. Today, banks need multiple levers to incentivize specific behaviors in a diverse, demanding, and savvy world of deposit customers. The distinct promotional levers (such as rate, offer duration, minimum balance, geography, bank relationship, and new money) are some of the most relevant “colors” on the palette that can be used to paint a compelling deposit offer design.
Consider a customer segment that believes the minimum balance is a challenge to meet, so they ignore a savings offer. A headline offer with an attractive rate and a balance requirement of $10,000 (or higher) would be out of reach for many new savers. Delivering customer-focused offers, with right-sized balance requirements, and possibly a shorter duration can convert more prospects into saving customers.
Geography is another important lever to consider. In Australia, banks offer attractive savings offers during the Chinese New Year, available only at select branches. This strategy is ideal to assist new market expansion or to reinvigorate a targeted market. Existing customers can be offered a new-money promotion with a tailored rate, duration, and balance requirements through analytically derived segmentation.
As an offer nears the completion date, banks can leverage models to present retention offers to existing promotional customers to stem costly runoff that can exceed 40% at many banks. Effective retention offers ensure the promotional investment was not wasted. As a best practice, banks should test offers with clients and prospects routinely to discover what works (and what doesn’t) with various customer segments.
Customers’ needs are dynamic, and banks require flexible systems that allow them to deliver and test offers to meet financial targets and improve the customer experience. Offer design can tap into many levers, as we have seen with mobile carriers. A single, static design cannot meet today’s requirements for more personalized, customer-focused, multi-faceted strategies.
In our next post, we’ll explore how banks can actually achieve these goals with the right technology and analytics.
Popular Posts
Average U.S. FICO® Score at 716, Indicating Improvement in Consumer Credit Behaviors Despite Pandemic
The FICO Score is a broad-based, independent standard measure of credit risk
Read more
The GSE Data Is Public. Here's What It Shows About Credit Score Modernization.
Independent Milliman analysis of GSE historical data confirms what anyone can now verify directly: FICO® Score 10T is the most predictive score.
Read more
FICO® Score High Achievers: Is Age the Only Factor?
<p>FICO’s latest research on <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/us-credit-quality-rising-the-beat-goes-on/" target="_blank">national FICO® Score distribution</a> shows that US credit quality continues to trend upwards, with an increasing number of consumers scoring in the highest scores ranges. Given that, we decided it was time to refresh our study on “<a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/infographic-what-does-a-high-credit-scorer-look-like/" target="_blank">FICO® Score high achievers</a>,” where we examine the credit behavioural profiles of consumers with higher credit scores.</p> <p>As expected, our latest study showed that older people generally have higher scores, as has been the case in our <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/age-before-beauty-credit-worthiness-before-youth/" target="_blank">past research</a>. This is largely because they have trade lines that have been open longer, which leads to higher scores (assuming the trade lines are in good standing and all other things equal). The most credit savvy among you will remember that length of credit history accounts for roughly 15% of the overall <a href="http://www.myfico.com/CreditEducation/WhatsInYourScore.aspx" target="_blank">FICO® Score calculation</a>.</p> <p>But for younger consumers, it isn’t too helpful to say, “just wait until you are 50 years old, and that will fix things!” Thus, I decided to dive deeper with our analysis, including looking at the credit behavioural characteristics of younger consumers with high FICO® Scores.</p> <p>In this analysis, I looked at credit characteristics for the two highest score bands, 750-799 and 800-850, which have about 16% and 23% of the population, respectively. I further broke this down by looking at the characteristics of the youngest 15% in each group, which occurs at age 29 for the 750-799 group and 43 for the 800-850. We used FICO<strong>®</strong> Score 9 for our analysis, and examined typical variables of the categories that go into the make-up of the score.</p> <p><a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-29367" src="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png" alt="fico-score-high-achiever-table" width="715" height="747" /></a></p> <p>Since there’s a lot to dissect in this chart, I’ll highlight a few findings that struck me: <ul> <li><strong>Credit history.</strong> Higher scores are undoubtedly associated with a longer time on file. What’s striking is the higher average time on file for the 800+ group, both overall and for revolving accounts (the most common trade line). Clearly, it helps to start credit use early in life – but that’s not the sole determining factor for high scoring. The younger cohorts in both the 800+ and 750-799 groups have time on file medians significantly less than their older counterparts.</li> <li><strong>New credit.</strong> High credit scorers do, in fact, pursue new credit. We see little variation in months since last trade line opening and last inquiry among all groups observed.</li> <li><strong>Pay on time.</strong> As you might expect, the further in the past the delinquency, the higher the score – and that’s <u>if</u> a delinquency ever happened. 95% of the 800+ people and 72% of the 750-799 group have never been delinquent, which is a striking contrast to the 57% for the total population. The percentages for the younger groups are even higher, especially so for the 750-799ers. Collection items are also scarce for these high scorers. While 23% of the national population have collection items greater than $99, the figures are only 0.5% for the 800+ group and 3% for the 750-799 group. It is clear that, in conjunction with starting a credit file early, paying on time is a key trait of the FICO® Score high achiever.</li> <li><strong>Balance and utilization.</strong> Finally, we look at how credit is being used, focusing on revolving product use. (Since most people only have one mortgage or one auto loan, variation in instalment product figures is minimal and driven by payment history, which is near perfect for high scorers, as we’ve seen.) FICO® Score high achievers tend to have more open revolving accounts. While the % active trades and utilization are generally lower, by no means do high scorers avoid the use of credit products. What drives the difference here is the amount of <u>available</u> revolving credit utilized. The 800+ group is roughly 1/4 of the national median, both in total and on their highest utilized card; they also have lower balances and more cards<em>. </em>The 750-799 group is more active and higher utilized, but still only at 2/3 of the national figures. The young 750-799 group compensate with lower revolving balances and, as a result, lower utilization, which is in line with what we see for the 800+ group.</li> <li><strong>Benchmarks.</strong> I’d like to point out that while this study provides good benchmarks of the typical credit traits of the FICO® Score high achiever, individual credit profiles will vary widely. And keep in mind that when we sort groups of consumers as a whole by different behaviours, some results may look superficially odd. For example, the 800+ band has a longer median average open account time (128 months) than average revolving months on file (140 months).</li> </ul> So, what do we conclude? A huge takeaway is that high scorers don’t have too much in the way of serious delinquencies and negative public record data.</p> <p>In most respects, the young 800+ people are like their peer group. They really only differ markedly in their shorter credit history and higher non-mortgage balance, both of which are a function of life stage. Our results show that you don’t have to be a credit product hermit; these high scorers have more credit cards. The takeaway is to start credit activity early and maintain well-managed and moderate usage.</p> <p>In many ways, the young 750-799 people are more interesting because their age profile is much younger. Their credit characteristics differ more from their peer group, particularly in terms of length of credit history. They compensate by having almost pristine credit records and lower balances.</p> <p>Ultimately, 39% of US consumers are FICO® Score high achievers, which they accomplish by following common-sense credit practices. It ain’t rocket science!</p>
Read moreTake the next step
Connect with FICO for answers to all your product and solution questions. Interested in becoming a business partner? Contact us to learn more. We look forward to hearing from you.