Competing in a Digital-first Environment: Is your Origination Process Ready?
“He who defends everything defends nothing” That quote, attributed to the 18th century King of Prussia Frederick the Great, refers to military strategy, but it could just as eas…
“He who defends everything defends nothing”
That quote, attributed to the 18th century King of Prussia Frederick the Great, refers to military strategy, but it could just as easily be used to describe the dilemma faced by financial services executives as they modernize their loan origination processes.
In the first post of my multi-part series on how banks are solving common challenges in acquiring and retaining new customers, I looked at the challenges and opportunities financial institutions need to address in improving marketing performance. In this write-up, I want to focus on similarly practical solutions to common challenges in the origination process as it is a convergence point for a lot of different objectives necessary to deliver growth—provide a compelling customer experience, minimize credit losses, prevent fraud, maximize revenue, and comply with regulations.
Fully addressing all of those objectives (or defending all of those fronts) is an impossible task.
Move fast, but make sure the applicant feels in control. Grow the portfolio, but minimize credit losses. Fully enable digital account opening, but stop identity fraud. Maximize profitability and offer acceptance at the same time. Continually modernize processes while staying in compliance with regulations that were written decades ago.
You can’t do everything. Market laggards try anyway. Market leaders set a clear vision for what they want to be and (just as importantly) what they don’t want to be and they exercise discipline in pursuing that vision and avoiding distractions. They leverage data and advanced analytics to understand the trade-offs and opportunity costs of their decisions and they rely on that insight to drive their strategies.
When we apply this mindset to the origination process, some key questions emerge.
What customers are you trying to acquire?
The characteristics of your origination process should reflect what your target customers value. Profitable, super-prime credit customers are highly sought after and have extremely high experience and pricing expectations. New-to-credit customers may be looking for more guidance and education, but come with risk. A customer may be looking for tangible evidence that you know who they are and will treat them differently as a result.
A focused and well-designed origination process may be mildly frustrating to customers who aren’t your target. That’s OK. The goal is to drive self-selection for the population of customers you want in your portfolio.
What are your portfolio-level performance goals?
You may know what types of customers you want to acquire, but are those customers producing, in aggregate, the right performance for your portfolio? Are specific decision points in your origination process—like pricing—negatively impacting important metrics like offer acceptance rate or revenue per customer? Are organizational constraints—like a limited underwriting staff—preventing your acquisition strategy from producing the results you expect? Market leaders don’t just design an origination process and then hope for the best. They measure performance and use analytics to continually fine tune that process.
What’s your appetite for fraud?
This is a particularly important question as a majority of credit applications migrate to digital channels and fraudsters increasingly focus their efforts on the account opening process. Strategies for mitigating application fraud sit on a continuum. The extremes on either end of the continuum are untenable—you can’t ignore digital account opening altogether nor can you design a digital account opening process so restrictive that no fraud occurs. The right answer is somewhere in the middle, but where exactly? How much friction should you introduce into the process to dissuade most fraudsters without frustrating too many legitimate customers? Which specific fraud detection tools should you utilize and in what sequence, in order to maximize your hit rate while containing costs? Surprisingly, many institutions don’t openly describe their fraud appetite in advance of opening up digital channels for account opening.
Are your post-book operations ready?
The origination process shouldn’t exist within a silo. The decisions you make when booking a new customer have vast implications for post-book operational areas like credit exposure management, marketing, fraud mitigation, and collections. The same organizational priorities that inform the design of the origination process should inform process design for the rest of the credit lifecycle. If your strategy is to take calculated risks within targeted near-prime or sub-prime populations, your collections department should be ready to handle a higher volume of delinquencies. If your strategy is to provide the most seamless and convenient digital account opening experience in the market, your transactional and portfolio fraud detection capabilities need to be best in class. Robust post-book systems and processes can make high-risk origination strategies pay off. Conversely, poorly-designed post-book operations can make the safest origination strategy a longshot. Oddly, at many clients, we find that critical analytics used in origination (remember that app fraud score that just met the cutoff?) are not passed along to post-book operations.
Focus is Key
It is almost irresistibly tempting, when redesigning legacy systems and business processes, to try and plan for every contingency. To address every possible use case. To ensure no one is left out. To defend everything.
When it comes to redesigning the origination process—a convergence point for many different (often conflicting) objectives—the key to success is focus. In FICO’s experience, building an effective origination processes that can compete in today’s digital-first environment starts with a desire to understand and make strategic trade-offs; and then quickly adapt in this agile market.
Popular Posts
Average U.S. FICO® Score at 716, Indicating Improvement in Consumer Credit Behaviors Despite Pandemic
The FICO Score is a broad-based, independent standard measure of credit risk
Read more
The GSE Data Is Public. Here's What It Shows About Credit Score Modernization.
Independent Milliman analysis of GSE historical data confirms what anyone can now verify directly: FICO® Score 10T is the most predictive score.
Read more
FICO® Score High Achievers: Is Age the Only Factor?
<p>FICO’s latest research on <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/us-credit-quality-rising-the-beat-goes-on/" target="_blank">national FICO® Score distribution</a> shows that US credit quality continues to trend upwards, with an increasing number of consumers scoring in the highest scores ranges. Given that, we decided it was time to refresh our study on “<a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/infographic-what-does-a-high-credit-scorer-look-like/" target="_blank">FICO® Score high achievers</a>,” where we examine the credit behavioural profiles of consumers with higher credit scores.</p> <p>As expected, our latest study showed that older people generally have higher scores, as has been the case in our <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/age-before-beauty-credit-worthiness-before-youth/" target="_blank">past research</a>. This is largely because they have trade lines that have been open longer, which leads to higher scores (assuming the trade lines are in good standing and all other things equal). The most credit savvy among you will remember that length of credit history accounts for roughly 15% of the overall <a href="http://www.myfico.com/CreditEducation/WhatsInYourScore.aspx" target="_blank">FICO® Score calculation</a>.</p> <p>But for younger consumers, it isn’t too helpful to say, “just wait until you are 50 years old, and that will fix things!” Thus, I decided to dive deeper with our analysis, including looking at the credit behavioural characteristics of younger consumers with high FICO® Scores.</p> <p>In this analysis, I looked at credit characteristics for the two highest score bands, 750-799 and 800-850, which have about 16% and 23% of the population, respectively. I further broke this down by looking at the characteristics of the youngest 15% in each group, which occurs at age 29 for the 750-799 group and 43 for the 800-850. We used FICO<strong>®</strong> Score 9 for our analysis, and examined typical variables of the categories that go into the make-up of the score.</p> <p><a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-29367" src="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png" alt="fico-score-high-achiever-table" width="715" height="747" /></a></p> <p>Since there’s a lot to dissect in this chart, I’ll highlight a few findings that struck me: <ul> <li><strong>Credit history.</strong> Higher scores are undoubtedly associated with a longer time on file. What’s striking is the higher average time on file for the 800+ group, both overall and for revolving accounts (the most common trade line). Clearly, it helps to start credit use early in life – but that’s not the sole determining factor for high scoring. The younger cohorts in both the 800+ and 750-799 groups have time on file medians significantly less than their older counterparts.</li> <li><strong>New credit.</strong> High credit scorers do, in fact, pursue new credit. We see little variation in months since last trade line opening and last inquiry among all groups observed.</li> <li><strong>Pay on time.</strong> As you might expect, the further in the past the delinquency, the higher the score – and that’s <u>if</u> a delinquency ever happened. 95% of the 800+ people and 72% of the 750-799 group have never been delinquent, which is a striking contrast to the 57% for the total population. The percentages for the younger groups are even higher, especially so for the 750-799ers. Collection items are also scarce for these high scorers. While 23% of the national population have collection items greater than $99, the figures are only 0.5% for the 800+ group and 3% for the 750-799 group. It is clear that, in conjunction with starting a credit file early, paying on time is a key trait of the FICO® Score high achiever.</li> <li><strong>Balance and utilization.</strong> Finally, we look at how credit is being used, focusing on revolving product use. (Since most people only have one mortgage or one auto loan, variation in instalment product figures is minimal and driven by payment history, which is near perfect for high scorers, as we’ve seen.) FICO® Score high achievers tend to have more open revolving accounts. While the % active trades and utilization are generally lower, by no means do high scorers avoid the use of credit products. What drives the difference here is the amount of <u>available</u> revolving credit utilized. The 800+ group is roughly 1/4 of the national median, both in total and on their highest utilized card; they also have lower balances and more cards<em>. </em>The 750-799 group is more active and higher utilized, but still only at 2/3 of the national figures. The young 750-799 group compensate with lower revolving balances and, as a result, lower utilization, which is in line with what we see for the 800+ group.</li> <li><strong>Benchmarks.</strong> I’d like to point out that while this study provides good benchmarks of the typical credit traits of the FICO® Score high achiever, individual credit profiles will vary widely. And keep in mind that when we sort groups of consumers as a whole by different behaviours, some results may look superficially odd. For example, the 800+ band has a longer median average open account time (128 months) than average revolving months on file (140 months).</li> </ul> So, what do we conclude? A huge takeaway is that high scorers don’t have too much in the way of serious delinquencies and negative public record data.</p> <p>In most respects, the young 800+ people are like their peer group. They really only differ markedly in their shorter credit history and higher non-mortgage balance, both of which are a function of life stage. Our results show that you don’t have to be a credit product hermit; these high scorers have more credit cards. The takeaway is to start credit activity early and maintain well-managed and moderate usage.</p> <p>In many ways, the young 750-799 people are more interesting because their age profile is much younger. Their credit characteristics differ more from their peer group, particularly in terms of length of credit history. They compensate by having almost pristine credit records and lower balances.</p> <p>Ultimately, 39% of US consumers are FICO® Score high achievers, which they accomplish by following common-sense credit practices. It ain’t rocket science!</p>
Read moreTake the next step
Connect with FICO for answers to all your product and solution questions. Interested in becoming a business partner? Contact us to learn more. We look forward to hearing from you.