Cyber, Fraud, Compliance Predictions in 2020
The 2020 trends in TPRM, AI and convergence spark déjà vu
“It’s like déjà vu all over again,” is one of my favorite Yogi Berra-isms, and as I look across the domain spaces served by FICO to write my 2020 predictions, it’s definitely déjà vu all over again. Specifically:
- Cybersecurity risk awareness is on another expansion wave, as a best-practice component of third-party risk management (TPRM).
- At long last, fraud and compliance infrastructures are starting to converge.
- In the US, the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning in compliance is set to expand dramatically, per directives from the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN).
Let’s dive in.
TPRM Takes Off
Over the last decade, organizations have become increasingly aware of their own cybersecurity risk. With tools like the FICO® Cyber Risk Score, they can effectively gauge their own risk and importantly, that of their third-party business partners.
In 2019 FICO teamed up with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce to spread the word about our joint Assessment of Business Cybersecurity, hosting a Cyber Event series around the country. As a benchmark, the ABC has driven much awareness of the Cyber Risk Score and tools like it, and served to start a large-scale dialog about data breach risk.
As a result of this dialog, nearly 1,000 organizations have discovered their FICO Cyber Risk Score (now available on Amazon Web Services), driving even more conversation about cyber risk, including cyber risk as a critical component of TPRM. In 2020 I expect that growth to continue, from a combination of FICO’s efforts with the Chamber, efforts of others in the industry, and the regulatory intensification we’ve seen on companies’ culpability for data breaches stemming from third parties.
This regulatory pressure is happening in other regions as well. For example, in Europe under GDPR, companies with insufficient data protection practices leading to breaches can be fined up to €20 million, or 4% of the company’s global annual turnover of the previous financial year.
I’m not the only one who foresees big growth in TPRM. Industry forecasts project the global TPRM market to grow from $3.2 billion in 2019 to $6.8 billion in 2024, at a CAGR of 15.9%.
Relative to that, I also predict continued strong growth for the cyber insurance market, as cyber risk underwriting continues its transition from art to science. With only about 5% of all businesses in the US covered by cyber insurance, the uptake of analytics tools for underwriting is set to blast off.
Fraud and Compliance Infrastructures Converge
I’ll start with an important distinction — from a process standpoint, the financial industry has been talking about the convergence of fraud and compliance for almost a decade. However, to achieve process convergence — and maximize gains along both a cost efficiency axis and an efficacy axis — fraud and compliance must be integrated at an infrastructure level.
I predict that in 2020, fraud and compliance functions will converge at many large banking institutions. The stage is already set; at FICO World 2019 in New York City, we learned that the capabilities of fraud and anti-money laundering (AML) systems have about an 80% overlap. This convergence is being pushed forward by a FinCEN directive, with consultants such as McKinsey & Co. noting the “incredible windfall when institutions switch from legacy ad-hoc financial crime compliance collaboration to full counter-crime team integration – a move that comes with a variety of intelligence, risk and resource benefits.”
Use of AI and ML in Compliance Will Expand
Hand in hand with converged infrastructure, various government entities in the US, including FinCEN, “encourage banks to consider, evaluate, and, where appropriate, responsibly implement innovative approaches to meet their Bank Secrecy Act/anti-money laundering (BSA/AML) compliance obligations, in order to further strengthen the financial system against illicit financial activity.” Artificial intelligence is specifically mentioned in the Joint Statement; in the real world, “innovative approaches” also includes machine learning (ML) and other advanced analytics technology.
As a result, in 2020 I believe we’ll see two trends: more institutions will put a toe in the water from a converged infrastructure standpoint, even if they’re not converging their processes yet. Still, they’re getting into a position where they can converge processes more easily in the future. The second trend, which my FICO colleague Frank Holzenthal also predicts, will be that more banks will be adopting AI and ML into what have traditionally been rules-driven processes.
Best wishes for 2020, and remember, when you come to a fork in the road, take it. For more trends on cybersecurity, TPRM, fraud and compliance, check out the recent interview with SafetyDetectives and my recent podcast with American Banker, or follow me on Twitter @dougoclare.
Popular Posts
Average U.S. FICO® Score at 716, Indicating Improvement in Consumer Credit Behaviors Despite Pandemic
The FICO Score is a broad-based, independent standard measure of credit risk
Read more
The GSE Data Is Public. Here's What It Shows About Credit Score Modernization.
Independent Milliman analysis of GSE historical data confirms what anyone can now verify directly: FICO® Score 10T is the most predictive score.
Read more
FICO® Score High Achievers: Is Age the Only Factor?
<p>FICO’s latest research on <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/us-credit-quality-rising-the-beat-goes-on/" target="_blank">national FICO® Score distribution</a> shows that US credit quality continues to trend upwards, with an increasing number of consumers scoring in the highest scores ranges. Given that, we decided it was time to refresh our study on “<a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/infographic-what-does-a-high-credit-scorer-look-like/" target="_blank">FICO® Score high achievers</a>,” where we examine the credit behavioural profiles of consumers with higher credit scores.</p> <p>As expected, our latest study showed that older people generally have higher scores, as has been the case in our <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/age-before-beauty-credit-worthiness-before-youth/" target="_blank">past research</a>. This is largely because they have trade lines that have been open longer, which leads to higher scores (assuming the trade lines are in good standing and all other things equal). The most credit savvy among you will remember that length of credit history accounts for roughly 15% of the overall <a href="http://www.myfico.com/CreditEducation/WhatsInYourScore.aspx" target="_blank">FICO® Score calculation</a>.</p> <p>But for younger consumers, it isn’t too helpful to say, “just wait until you are 50 years old, and that will fix things!” Thus, I decided to dive deeper with our analysis, including looking at the credit behavioural characteristics of younger consumers with high FICO® Scores.</p> <p>In this analysis, I looked at credit characteristics for the two highest score bands, 750-799 and 800-850, which have about 16% and 23% of the population, respectively. I further broke this down by looking at the characteristics of the youngest 15% in each group, which occurs at age 29 for the 750-799 group and 43 for the 800-850. We used FICO<strong>®</strong> Score 9 for our analysis, and examined typical variables of the categories that go into the make-up of the score.</p> <p><a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-29367" src="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png" alt="fico-score-high-achiever-table" width="715" height="747" /></a></p> <p>Since there’s a lot to dissect in this chart, I’ll highlight a few findings that struck me: <ul> <li><strong>Credit history.</strong> Higher scores are undoubtedly associated with a longer time on file. What’s striking is the higher average time on file for the 800+ group, both overall and for revolving accounts (the most common trade line). Clearly, it helps to start credit use early in life – but that’s not the sole determining factor for high scoring. The younger cohorts in both the 800+ and 750-799 groups have time on file medians significantly less than their older counterparts.</li> <li><strong>New credit.</strong> High credit scorers do, in fact, pursue new credit. We see little variation in months since last trade line opening and last inquiry among all groups observed.</li> <li><strong>Pay on time.</strong> As you might expect, the further in the past the delinquency, the higher the score – and that’s <u>if</u> a delinquency ever happened. 95% of the 800+ people and 72% of the 750-799 group have never been delinquent, which is a striking contrast to the 57% for the total population. The percentages for the younger groups are even higher, especially so for the 750-799ers. Collection items are also scarce for these high scorers. While 23% of the national population have collection items greater than $99, the figures are only 0.5% for the 800+ group and 3% for the 750-799 group. It is clear that, in conjunction with starting a credit file early, paying on time is a key trait of the FICO® Score high achiever.</li> <li><strong>Balance and utilization.</strong> Finally, we look at how credit is being used, focusing on revolving product use. (Since most people only have one mortgage or one auto loan, variation in instalment product figures is minimal and driven by payment history, which is near perfect for high scorers, as we’ve seen.) FICO® Score high achievers tend to have more open revolving accounts. While the % active trades and utilization are generally lower, by no means do high scorers avoid the use of credit products. What drives the difference here is the amount of <u>available</u> revolving credit utilized. The 800+ group is roughly 1/4 of the national median, both in total and on their highest utilized card; they also have lower balances and more cards<em>. </em>The 750-799 group is more active and higher utilized, but still only at 2/3 of the national figures. The young 750-799 group compensate with lower revolving balances and, as a result, lower utilization, which is in line with what we see for the 800+ group.</li> <li><strong>Benchmarks.</strong> I’d like to point out that while this study provides good benchmarks of the typical credit traits of the FICO® Score high achiever, individual credit profiles will vary widely. And keep in mind that when we sort groups of consumers as a whole by different behaviours, some results may look superficially odd. For example, the 800+ band has a longer median average open account time (128 months) than average revolving months on file (140 months).</li> </ul> So, what do we conclude? A huge takeaway is that high scorers don’t have too much in the way of serious delinquencies and negative public record data.</p> <p>In most respects, the young 800+ people are like their peer group. They really only differ markedly in their shorter credit history and higher non-mortgage balance, both of which are a function of life stage. Our results show that you don’t have to be a credit product hermit; these high scorers have more credit cards. The takeaway is to start credit activity early and maintain well-managed and moderate usage.</p> <p>In many ways, the young 750-799 people are more interesting because their age profile is much younger. Their credit characteristics differ more from their peer group, particularly in terms of length of credit history. They compensate by having almost pristine credit records and lower balances.</p> <p>Ultimately, 39% of US consumers are FICO® Score high achievers, which they accomplish by following common-sense credit practices. It ain’t rocket science!</p>
Read moreTake the next step
Connect with FICO for answers to all your product and solution questions. Interested in becoming a business partner? Contact us to learn more. We look forward to hearing from you.