FICO Resilience Index is Strong Predictor of Consumer Need for Loan Accommodations
Latest research underscores relationship of index to October 2020 reported payment accommodations
Early in the COVID-19 pandemic, FICO data scientists discovered that the FICO® Resilience Index was a strong predictor of the likelihood that consumers were receiving loan accommodations such as payment deferrals and forbearances following implementation of the CARES Act.
In the months following the early summer peak in loan accommodations, FICO analysts wondered whether the relationship still held given that the mix and volume of consumers in payment accommodations was shifting. By October 2020, consumers with accommodations were either in longer-term arrangements (for example, 6 to 12-month forbearance for their mortgage), or had freshly-granted accommodations reflecting that they were finally starting to feel the financial stress brought on by the pandemic.
We examined a large, nationally representative sample of millions of consumers from October 2020 to test the ability of FICO® Resilience Index (calculated before the COVID-19 crisis started, as of January 2020) to rank order the likelihood of currently-in-force creditor accommodations.
We found that FICO® Resilience Index continues to be a strong predictor of the presence of loan accommodations in place as of October 2020 – representing a mix of “long haul” accommodations by mortgage lenders and newer short-term accommodations allowed on bankcard, auto finance and personal loan accounts. Our analysis excluded student loan accommodations given the wide prevalence of automatically granted accommodations in that industry.

Figure 1 demonstrates that within narrow FICO® Score bands, FICO® Resilience Index consistently rank orders the likelihood a consumer is in some form of mortgage loan accommodation. This pattern holds across other industries tested, including bankcards, where overall accommodation rates were very modest (as shown in figure 2).

In the midst of continuing economic uncertainty, some may wonder why we’re not focused on delinquency in highlighting FICO® Resilience Index industry-level results amidst the current pandemic.
The simple answer is that we have not seen serious delinquencies materialize to any significant degree. Delinquency levels remain well below pre-COVID levels as of January 2021, with record lows in mortgage delinquency rates. While our analysis demonstrates that FICO® Resilience Index is reliably rank-ordering an indicator of the current financial stress that consumers are experiencing (the presence of loan accommodations), we do not yet expect to see the index provide meaningful differentiation of serious delinquency rates that have thus far been held at bay.
It’s worth noting that meaningful FICO® Resilience Index validations based on delinquency definitions should focus on those with serious delinquency or defaults as opposed to borrowers that are one or two cycles delinquent, which can include “sloppy payer” behavior. FICO research has shown that resilient borrowers at a given FICO® Score may be more likely to go mildly delinquent regardless of the economic environment, but less likely to go seriously delinquent during a severe economic downturn.
With an eye toward our post-pandemic recovery, clients have inquired as to whether FICO® Resilience Index may offer insights into consumers’ credit behavior as they emerge from recent delinquency. Looking back at consumer credit behavior in the years immediately following the Great Recession, we discovered an intuitive result: consumers’ ability to “bounce back” from serious delinquencies was predicted by lower (more resilient) FICO® Resilience Index values.

Figure 3 looks at a large sample of consumers who were recently (and not currently) delinquent[1] as of October 2010 – two years into the Great Recession - tracking their serious delinquency performance (90+ days past due) for two years after the score date. The consistent rank ordering of default rates within narrow FICO® Score bands shows that more resilient consumers were much less likely to default over the next two years, as the U.S. emerged from the recession.
With additional stimulus spending and COVID relief programs anticipated in 2021, lenders and borrowers will hopefully avert the kind of spiking default rates and credit tightening that we experienced during the Great Recession. Whatever the length and severity of our current recession, FICO is here to support our clients’ efforts to better understand their customers’ resilience levels, put new strategies in place to keep credit flowing (taking resilience into account), and gradually build portfolio resilience over time.
[1] Defined as 30+ days past due within the previous year.
Popular Posts
Average U.S. FICO® Score at 716, Indicating Improvement in Consumer Credit Behaviors Despite Pandemic
The FICO Score is a broad-based, independent standard measure of credit risk
Read more
The GSE Data Is Public. Here's What It Shows About Credit Score Modernization.
Independent Milliman analysis of GSE historical data confirms what anyone can now verify directly: FICO® Score 10T is the most predictive score.
Read more
FICO® Score High Achievers: Is Age the Only Factor?
<p>FICO’s latest research on <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/us-credit-quality-rising-the-beat-goes-on/" target="_blank">national FICO® Score distribution</a> shows that US credit quality continues to trend upwards, with an increasing number of consumers scoring in the highest scores ranges. Given that, we decided it was time to refresh our study on “<a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/infographic-what-does-a-high-credit-scorer-look-like/" target="_blank">FICO® Score high achievers</a>,” where we examine the credit behavioural profiles of consumers with higher credit scores.</p> <p>As expected, our latest study showed that older people generally have higher scores, as has been the case in our <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/age-before-beauty-credit-worthiness-before-youth/" target="_blank">past research</a>. This is largely because they have trade lines that have been open longer, which leads to higher scores (assuming the trade lines are in good standing and all other things equal). The most credit savvy among you will remember that length of credit history accounts for roughly 15% of the overall <a href="http://www.myfico.com/CreditEducation/WhatsInYourScore.aspx" target="_blank">FICO® Score calculation</a>.</p> <p>But for younger consumers, it isn’t too helpful to say, “just wait until you are 50 years old, and that will fix things!” Thus, I decided to dive deeper with our analysis, including looking at the credit behavioural characteristics of younger consumers with high FICO® Scores.</p> <p>In this analysis, I looked at credit characteristics for the two highest score bands, 750-799 and 800-850, which have about 16% and 23% of the population, respectively. I further broke this down by looking at the characteristics of the youngest 15% in each group, which occurs at age 29 for the 750-799 group and 43 for the 800-850. We used FICO<strong>®</strong> Score 9 for our analysis, and examined typical variables of the categories that go into the make-up of the score.</p> <p><a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-29367" src="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png" alt="fico-score-high-achiever-table" width="715" height="747" /></a></p> <p>Since there’s a lot to dissect in this chart, I’ll highlight a few findings that struck me: <ul> <li><strong>Credit history.</strong> Higher scores are undoubtedly associated with a longer time on file. What’s striking is the higher average time on file for the 800+ group, both overall and for revolving accounts (the most common trade line). Clearly, it helps to start credit use early in life – but that’s not the sole determining factor for high scoring. The younger cohorts in both the 800+ and 750-799 groups have time on file medians significantly less than their older counterparts.</li> <li><strong>New credit.</strong> High credit scorers do, in fact, pursue new credit. We see little variation in months since last trade line opening and last inquiry among all groups observed.</li> <li><strong>Pay on time.</strong> As you might expect, the further in the past the delinquency, the higher the score – and that’s <u>if</u> a delinquency ever happened. 95% of the 800+ people and 72% of the 750-799 group have never been delinquent, which is a striking contrast to the 57% for the total population. The percentages for the younger groups are even higher, especially so for the 750-799ers. Collection items are also scarce for these high scorers. While 23% of the national population have collection items greater than $99, the figures are only 0.5% for the 800+ group and 3% for the 750-799 group. It is clear that, in conjunction with starting a credit file early, paying on time is a key trait of the FICO® Score high achiever.</li> <li><strong>Balance and utilization.</strong> Finally, we look at how credit is being used, focusing on revolving product use. (Since most people only have one mortgage or one auto loan, variation in instalment product figures is minimal and driven by payment history, which is near perfect for high scorers, as we’ve seen.) FICO® Score high achievers tend to have more open revolving accounts. While the % active trades and utilization are generally lower, by no means do high scorers avoid the use of credit products. What drives the difference here is the amount of <u>available</u> revolving credit utilized. The 800+ group is roughly 1/4 of the national median, both in total and on their highest utilized card; they also have lower balances and more cards<em>. </em>The 750-799 group is more active and higher utilized, but still only at 2/3 of the national figures. The young 750-799 group compensate with lower revolving balances and, as a result, lower utilization, which is in line with what we see for the 800+ group.</li> <li><strong>Benchmarks.</strong> I’d like to point out that while this study provides good benchmarks of the typical credit traits of the FICO® Score high achiever, individual credit profiles will vary widely. And keep in mind that when we sort groups of consumers as a whole by different behaviours, some results may look superficially odd. For example, the 800+ band has a longer median average open account time (128 months) than average revolving months on file (140 months).</li> </ul> So, what do we conclude? A huge takeaway is that high scorers don’t have too much in the way of serious delinquencies and negative public record data.</p> <p>In most respects, the young 800+ people are like their peer group. They really only differ markedly in their shorter credit history and higher non-mortgage balance, both of which are a function of life stage. Our results show that you don’t have to be a credit product hermit; these high scorers have more credit cards. The takeaway is to start credit activity early and maintain well-managed and moderate usage.</p> <p>In many ways, the young 750-799 people are more interesting because their age profile is much younger. Their credit characteristics differ more from their peer group, particularly in terms of length of credit history. They compensate by having almost pristine credit records and lower balances.</p> <p>Ultimately, 39% of US consumers are FICO® Score high achievers, which they accomplish by following common-sense credit practices. It ain’t rocket science!</p>
Read moreTake the next step
Connect with FICO for answers to all your product and solution questions. Interested in becoming a business partner? Contact us to learn more. We look forward to hearing from you.