Fraud and Financial Crimes Convergence: Data
A Fireside Chat with Julie Conroy, Research Director of Aite and TJ Horan, VP of Product Management at FICO
This past year has been anything but normal, but one of the few things that has held steady is my advocacy around fraud and financial crimes convergence.
With the industry – and the rest of the world – going through so many changes, I teamed up with Julie Conroy, research director for Aite Group's Fraud & AML practice, to share our perspectives not only on why fraud and financial crimes convergence is important and quickly becoming the goal for many institutions across the industry, but also dive into how to make this a reality at your organization. Not only did I find the conversation with Julie to be thought-provoking as always, but it was also a lot of fun to film these remote location videos cross country during these no-travel pandemic times.
We’ve split this topic into three videos, each one focusing on data, technology, and people and processes respectively.
In this first video, we kick off the discussion by focusing on data.
Here’s an excerpt from the video, but be sure to watch the full video and the other two parts of the series:
TJ: Data is one of the key drivers of bringing together these worlds of financial crime and fraud. I think of it in three main ways. Any data scientist will tell you that the quality of the data helps significantly drive the performance of the analytics. More data and better quality data amounts to a better analytics end result. A key advantage of aligning and understanding the commonality and structure of your data is helping improve the overall analytics that are helping drive your fraud and financial crime functions.
I also think of it in terms of two other areas. One is from an operational efficiency standpoint. You have lots of conversations with your colleagues about data elements and what they are and what they mean. By having some institutional knowledge and common vocabulary, you drive a lot of efficiency.
The third area is governance. Where does the data come from? How has the quality been checked? How do we know the authenticity of the data? All of those aspects are important to get a common understanding and a common framework in order to help fuel convergence.
With all of this data, where would you suggest people get started?
Julie: All of this can be really intimidating for institutions. As we survey and interview financial institution executives, harnessing their data effectively is one of their biggest challenges, but also one of their biggest opportunities. If you can do that effectively, it can fuel and help leapfrog where your organization is today.
As you look at your opportunity, you first have to look at your internal data and find where you have common points between fraud and AML, how you can better cleanse the data, and how you can better perform entity resolution to get to a single view of the customer. All of that is essential to maximize your opportunity and then bring that data effectively into your analytics.
You’re having lots of conversations, in some cases, with the same people we are talking to. As you look at the opportunity for data for fraud and AML to collaborate more, where do you see the greatest opportunities and low hanging fruit?
TJ: When it comes to the combination of data, you can have structured and unstructured data. There may be areas of the organization that are very effectively leveraging unstructured data, things like text and other aspects, and then of course there is just the pure structured data. Things like payment transactions can be well-structured types of information, but in many instances, different parts of the organization have different access to those areas.
For example, you may have part of the organization looking at data from a structured standpoint, looking at transactions in real time – instantly – as they are happening, where another part of the organization doesn’t have access to those transactions until a particular cadence. That could be once a week or once a month while the information is batch uploaded to another system.
A lot of times by looking at those kinds of things, people can effectively leverage the power of their organization. Start by looking at what other parts of the organization have already solved and how that comes together.
A lot of this can seem overwhelming, check out the video above to hear where Julie recommends that you start as well as the rest of the fireside chat. Be sure to come back to watch the other two videos in the series --- I think you’ll find the whole series enjoyable.
Follow me on Twitter @FraudBird for more updates on the latest fraud topics.
Popular Posts
Average U.S. FICO® Score at 716, Indicating Improvement in Consumer Credit Behaviors Despite Pandemic
The FICO Score is a broad-based, independent standard measure of credit risk
Read more
The GSE Data Is Public. Here's What It Shows About Credit Score Modernization.
Independent Milliman analysis of GSE historical data confirms what anyone can now verify directly: FICO® Score 10T is the most predictive score.
Read more
FICO® Score High Achievers: Is Age the Only Factor?
<p>FICO’s latest research on <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/us-credit-quality-rising-the-beat-goes-on/" target="_blank">national FICO® Score distribution</a> shows that US credit quality continues to trend upwards, with an increasing number of consumers scoring in the highest scores ranges. Given that, we decided it was time to refresh our study on “<a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/infographic-what-does-a-high-credit-scorer-look-like/" target="_blank">FICO® Score high achievers</a>,” where we examine the credit behavioural profiles of consumers with higher credit scores.</p> <p>As expected, our latest study showed that older people generally have higher scores, as has been the case in our <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/age-before-beauty-credit-worthiness-before-youth/" target="_blank">past research</a>. This is largely because they have trade lines that have been open longer, which leads to higher scores (assuming the trade lines are in good standing and all other things equal). The most credit savvy among you will remember that length of credit history accounts for roughly 15% of the overall <a href="http://www.myfico.com/CreditEducation/WhatsInYourScore.aspx" target="_blank">FICO® Score calculation</a>.</p> <p>But for younger consumers, it isn’t too helpful to say, “just wait until you are 50 years old, and that will fix things!” Thus, I decided to dive deeper with our analysis, including looking at the credit behavioural characteristics of younger consumers with high FICO® Scores.</p> <p>In this analysis, I looked at credit characteristics for the two highest score bands, 750-799 and 800-850, which have about 16% and 23% of the population, respectively. I further broke this down by looking at the characteristics of the youngest 15% in each group, which occurs at age 29 for the 750-799 group and 43 for the 800-850. We used FICO<strong>®</strong> Score 9 for our analysis, and examined typical variables of the categories that go into the make-up of the score.</p> <p><a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-29367" src="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png" alt="fico-score-high-achiever-table" width="715" height="747" /></a></p> <p>Since there’s a lot to dissect in this chart, I’ll highlight a few findings that struck me: <ul> <li><strong>Credit history.</strong> Higher scores are undoubtedly associated with a longer time on file. What’s striking is the higher average time on file for the 800+ group, both overall and for revolving accounts (the most common trade line). Clearly, it helps to start credit use early in life – but that’s not the sole determining factor for high scoring. The younger cohorts in both the 800+ and 750-799 groups have time on file medians significantly less than their older counterparts.</li> <li><strong>New credit.</strong> High credit scorers do, in fact, pursue new credit. We see little variation in months since last trade line opening and last inquiry among all groups observed.</li> <li><strong>Pay on time.</strong> As you might expect, the further in the past the delinquency, the higher the score – and that’s <u>if</u> a delinquency ever happened. 95% of the 800+ people and 72% of the 750-799 group have never been delinquent, which is a striking contrast to the 57% for the total population. The percentages for the younger groups are even higher, especially so for the 750-799ers. Collection items are also scarce for these high scorers. While 23% of the national population have collection items greater than $99, the figures are only 0.5% for the 800+ group and 3% for the 750-799 group. It is clear that, in conjunction with starting a credit file early, paying on time is a key trait of the FICO® Score high achiever.</li> <li><strong>Balance and utilization.</strong> Finally, we look at how credit is being used, focusing on revolving product use. (Since most people only have one mortgage or one auto loan, variation in instalment product figures is minimal and driven by payment history, which is near perfect for high scorers, as we’ve seen.) FICO® Score high achievers tend to have more open revolving accounts. While the % active trades and utilization are generally lower, by no means do high scorers avoid the use of credit products. What drives the difference here is the amount of <u>available</u> revolving credit utilized. The 800+ group is roughly 1/4 of the national median, both in total and on their highest utilized card; they also have lower balances and more cards<em>. </em>The 750-799 group is more active and higher utilized, but still only at 2/3 of the national figures. The young 750-799 group compensate with lower revolving balances and, as a result, lower utilization, which is in line with what we see for the 800+ group.</li> <li><strong>Benchmarks.</strong> I’d like to point out that while this study provides good benchmarks of the typical credit traits of the FICO® Score high achiever, individual credit profiles will vary widely. And keep in mind that when we sort groups of consumers as a whole by different behaviours, some results may look superficially odd. For example, the 800+ band has a longer median average open account time (128 months) than average revolving months on file (140 months).</li> </ul> So, what do we conclude? A huge takeaway is that high scorers don’t have too much in the way of serious delinquencies and negative public record data.</p> <p>In most respects, the young 800+ people are like their peer group. They really only differ markedly in their shorter credit history and higher non-mortgage balance, both of which are a function of life stage. Our results show that you don’t have to be a credit product hermit; these high scorers have more credit cards. The takeaway is to start credit activity early and maintain well-managed and moderate usage.</p> <p>In many ways, the young 750-799 people are more interesting because their age profile is much younger. Their credit characteristics differ more from their peer group, particularly in terms of length of credit history. They compensate by having almost pristine credit records and lower balances.</p> <p>Ultimately, 39% of US consumers are FICO® Score high achievers, which they accomplish by following common-sense credit practices. It ain’t rocket science!</p>
Read moreTake the next step
Connect with FICO for answers to all your product and solution questions. Interested in becoming a business partner? Contact us to learn more. We look forward to hearing from you.