Instant Payments Mean Real-Time Payments Fraud
The global adoption of instant payments schemes, alongside the problems suffered by early adopters, has turned the focus to real-time payments fraud
Real-time payment schemes have exploded in recent years, with most major economies having their own payment scheme. For example, there is UPI in India, PIX in Brazil, and Faster Payments in the UK.
Real-time payments schemes are not new – indeed Japan has had a scheme since 1973 and Switzerland was the first European scheme in 1987. But the global adoption and rapid growth of such schemes, alongside the problems suffered by early adopters, has shifted the focus to real-time payments fraud.
Real-Time Payments Equal Real-Time Crime
The ability to send money quickly makes financial crime both easier to commit and more difficult to trace. Real-time payments make multiple types of fraud more attractive and enable the fast movement and laundering of criminal proceeds. The real-time payments fraud experiences of countries such as the UK provide a lesson to more recent schemes of what can happen to fraud rates when money can be transmitted quickly.
Increased awareness of fraud implications is coupled with higher values that can be transferred using these mechanisms. In the UK, £250K can now be sent in a single, irrevocable payment – and the system has been tested for up to an eyewatering £10 million. In Europe, SEPA CT Inst currently stands at a more modest €15K but is expected to increase. Individual banks can set their own limits below this, but even those with lower limits allow people to send - and potentially lose - life-changing amounts.
Fraud Using Real-Time Payments will Impact Businesses
Countries that are recent adopters of real-time payments introduce an additional factor to the fraud landscape. Newer schemes use the ISO2022XML messaging framework, which allows for additional information to be sent with the payment details. This is important because it makes these schemes more usable for B2B payments in a way that older schemes, such as UK Faster Payments, aren’t yet.
This raises the prospect of increased real-time payments fraud against businesses. We’ve already seen the impact of authorized push payment fraud (APP fraud) on businesses, even when payments are not cleared the same day. Losses have continued to sky rocket as criminals take advantage of the irrevocable nature of real-time payments.
Who Is Liable?
Nearly a decade ago, Which?, a UK consumer protection group, began championing for protection for victims of APP fraud. After some initial strategies such as the Contingent Reimbursement Model (CRM), the Payment Systems Regulator introduced the APP fraud reimbursement protection on 7 October 2024. Since then, 88% of APP losses have been reimbursed to victims.
The issue of liability still needs to play out in other geographies, and it’s likely that different geographies will take different stances on exactly where liability sits. As I previously reported, markets such as Australia and Singapore are also extending liability beyond financial institutions to include organizations that are also viewed as having responsibility for scams such as telecommunications providers and social media companies.
Regardless of where legal liability ends up, there are compelling reasons why banks need to address fraud in real-time payments now, including:
- Protecting their customers from losses to improve customer experience and avoid attrition.
- Protecting their reputation – managing this kind of fraud could become a competitive advantage.
- Avoiding regulatory action – being proactive could help prevent new regulations that are likely to be difficult and expensive to manage.
Taking a Holistic Approach to Real-Time Payments Fraud
Real-time payments feed a complex fraud ecosystem, driving other fraud types including account takeover fraud, application fraud, and money-laundering. Banks that take a more holistic approach to fraud prevention, one that works across channels, payment mechanisms, and the customer lifecycle, will be better equipped to protect their organizations and their customers.
How FICO Can Help You Prevent Real-Time Payments Fraud
- Understand more about modern approaches to enterprise fraud with the six E’s of enterprise fraud
- Read the Datos Insights analyst paper: Beyond point Solutions, orchestrating the future of fraud prevention
- Explore FICO fraud solutions
This is an update of a post from 2018.
Popular Posts
Average U.S. FICO® Score at 716, Indicating Improvement in Consumer Credit Behaviors Despite Pandemic
The FICO Score is a broad-based, independent standard measure of credit risk
Read more
The GSE Data Is Public. Here's What It Shows About Credit Score Modernization.
Independent Milliman analysis of GSE historical data confirms what anyone can now verify directly: FICO® Score 10T is the most predictive score.
Read more
FICO® Score High Achievers: Is Age the Only Factor?
<p>FICO’s latest research on <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/us-credit-quality-rising-the-beat-goes-on/" target="_blank">national FICO® Score distribution</a> shows that US credit quality continues to trend upwards, with an increasing number of consumers scoring in the highest scores ranges. Given that, we decided it was time to refresh our study on “<a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/infographic-what-does-a-high-credit-scorer-look-like/" target="_blank">FICO® Score high achievers</a>,” where we examine the credit behavioural profiles of consumers with higher credit scores.</p> <p>As expected, our latest study showed that older people generally have higher scores, as has been the case in our <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/age-before-beauty-credit-worthiness-before-youth/" target="_blank">past research</a>. This is largely because they have trade lines that have been open longer, which leads to higher scores (assuming the trade lines are in good standing and all other things equal). The most credit savvy among you will remember that length of credit history accounts for roughly 15% of the overall <a href="http://www.myfico.com/CreditEducation/WhatsInYourScore.aspx" target="_blank">FICO® Score calculation</a>.</p> <p>But for younger consumers, it isn’t too helpful to say, “just wait until you are 50 years old, and that will fix things!” Thus, I decided to dive deeper with our analysis, including looking at the credit behavioural characteristics of younger consumers with high FICO® Scores.</p> <p>In this analysis, I looked at credit characteristics for the two highest score bands, 750-799 and 800-850, which have about 16% and 23% of the population, respectively. I further broke this down by looking at the characteristics of the youngest 15% in each group, which occurs at age 29 for the 750-799 group and 43 for the 800-850. We used FICO<strong>®</strong> Score 9 for our analysis, and examined typical variables of the categories that go into the make-up of the score.</p> <p><a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-29367" src="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png" alt="fico-score-high-achiever-table" width="715" height="747" /></a></p> <p>Since there’s a lot to dissect in this chart, I’ll highlight a few findings that struck me: <ul> <li><strong>Credit history.</strong> Higher scores are undoubtedly associated with a longer time on file. What’s striking is the higher average time on file for the 800+ group, both overall and for revolving accounts (the most common trade line). Clearly, it helps to start credit use early in life – but that’s not the sole determining factor for high scoring. The younger cohorts in both the 800+ and 750-799 groups have time on file medians significantly less than their older counterparts.</li> <li><strong>New credit.</strong> High credit scorers do, in fact, pursue new credit. We see little variation in months since last trade line opening and last inquiry among all groups observed.</li> <li><strong>Pay on time.</strong> As you might expect, the further in the past the delinquency, the higher the score – and that’s <u>if</u> a delinquency ever happened. 95% of the 800+ people and 72% of the 750-799 group have never been delinquent, which is a striking contrast to the 57% for the total population. The percentages for the younger groups are even higher, especially so for the 750-799ers. Collection items are also scarce for these high scorers. While 23% of the national population have collection items greater than $99, the figures are only 0.5% for the 800+ group and 3% for the 750-799 group. It is clear that, in conjunction with starting a credit file early, paying on time is a key trait of the FICO® Score high achiever.</li> <li><strong>Balance and utilization.</strong> Finally, we look at how credit is being used, focusing on revolving product use. (Since most people only have one mortgage or one auto loan, variation in instalment product figures is minimal and driven by payment history, which is near perfect for high scorers, as we’ve seen.) FICO® Score high achievers tend to have more open revolving accounts. While the % active trades and utilization are generally lower, by no means do high scorers avoid the use of credit products. What drives the difference here is the amount of <u>available</u> revolving credit utilized. The 800+ group is roughly 1/4 of the national median, both in total and on their highest utilized card; they also have lower balances and more cards<em>. </em>The 750-799 group is more active and higher utilized, but still only at 2/3 of the national figures. The young 750-799 group compensate with lower revolving balances and, as a result, lower utilization, which is in line with what we see for the 800+ group.</li> <li><strong>Benchmarks.</strong> I’d like to point out that while this study provides good benchmarks of the typical credit traits of the FICO® Score high achiever, individual credit profiles will vary widely. And keep in mind that when we sort groups of consumers as a whole by different behaviours, some results may look superficially odd. For example, the 800+ band has a longer median average open account time (128 months) than average revolving months on file (140 months).</li> </ul> So, what do we conclude? A huge takeaway is that high scorers don’t have too much in the way of serious delinquencies and negative public record data.</p> <p>In most respects, the young 800+ people are like their peer group. They really only differ markedly in their shorter credit history and higher non-mortgage balance, both of which are a function of life stage. Our results show that you don’t have to be a credit product hermit; these high scorers have more credit cards. The takeaway is to start credit activity early and maintain well-managed and moderate usage.</p> <p>In many ways, the young 750-799 people are more interesting because their age profile is much younger. Their credit characteristics differ more from their peer group, particularly in terms of length of credit history. They compensate by having almost pristine credit records and lower balances.</p> <p>Ultimately, 39% of US consumers are FICO® Score high achievers, which they accomplish by following common-sense credit practices. It ain’t rocket science!</p>
Read moreTake the next step
Connect with FICO for answers to all your product and solution questions. Interested in becoming a business partner? Contact us to learn more. We look forward to hearing from you.