Poor Affordability Analytics Create a Disconnect for Telcos
Telco strategies depend on cross-selling and upselling services, which makes affordability analytics critical
UK Telco regulator Ofcom continues to push operators to ensure they are treating customers fairly with affordable access to phone, broadband, digital and pay TV services. Indeed, today comms providers’ corporate strategies boast deep, trusted customer relationships and are include ever more services to upsell, cross-sell and boost the average revenue per user/unit, while reducing churn. But there’s clearly a disconnect between this and the way some providers approach customer affordability, which shows the need for better affordability analytics.
Why Customer Insight Is Everything
Recent findings on the affordability of comms services published by regulators revealed some surprising insights and glimpse at the scale of exposure.
- Out-of-work Universal Credit Claimants can be spending nearly 9% of their disposable incomes on broadband.
- One in 20 (5%) households surveyed are not confident about their ability to pay for comms services within the next three months.
- Around one in five (20%) households report that they are struggling to pay for at least one comms service, with some considering:
- Cancelling services they can no longer afford.
- Making changes to existing services.
- Reducing spend on other items including food and clothes to cover bills.
- Deliberately missing payments.
- Making changes to the way they pay including by credit cards, payment holidays, or deferral arrangements.
- An estimated two million UK households are experiencing affordability issues with either fixed broadband or smartphone.
- Unsurprisingly, low-income households and those in receipt of benefits are more likely to have affordability issues.
Against this backdrop, the cost-of-living pressures through macro-economic events are well-documented, while many providers favour implementing mid-contract price increases, often above the Consumer Price Index, leading to some customers paying 8% or more for services.
How Can Providers Better Address Affordability in the Spirit of Regulations?
Comms providers need to be better at proactively identifying financially vulnerable households / customers and managing them accordingly.
Having a customer-level view of all customer relationships and commitments should be a given. On top of that data, providers should apply affordability analytics to identify signals and triggers in the data and customer behaviour, whether this is for cross-sell and upsell marketing exclusions, down-sell to identify and move customers to social tariffs, or generally taking automated decisions in the customer’s best interests.
There is a rich dataset sitting within comms providers’ back offices to help achieve this, but most are unable to join the dots across their fragmented organisational silos. Clearly, any effective decisioning environment that can ingest multiple data sources, apply analytics and generate automated decisions and actions will always be a win-win.
At FICO, we continually help our telecommunications clients ensure they have the very best tools to underpin the identification of at-risk customers, those struggling to pay, or showing signs of persistent debt.
By taking actions that may impact customers, such as promoting social tariffs, operators need to be sure that they apply the appropriate analytics to understand customers at a granular level, as well as understanding the overall make-up of their portfolios.
Forward-Looking Scenario Testing Offers a View of What’s Coming
With the Office of Budget Responsibility warning that living standards are set for a historic fall over the next 12 months, following the Treasury’s Spring Statement, telco executives should be asking themselves what impact this will have on their customer portfolios right down to the individual customer level.
For example, if interest rates are further increased in a bid to slow down the rate of inflation, what is the potential impact to the affordability of the customer base? How many additional customers may struggle to pay bills or look at cancelling some services?
What would any affordability impacts mean to telco pre-delinquency, collections strategies and operations? Again, during periods of heightened financial stress, there’s always a need for careful customer management, marketing exclusion, the ability to automatically move customers to social tariffs, and the ability to have meaningful two-way dialogue with customers through their preferred channels. This can all be orchestrated via FICO Platform, with Business Outcome Simulation a key component.
Business Outcome Simulation enables businesses to mimic market conditions, as well as test alternative versions of current decision services. Multiple scenarios, such as “how many customers would enter the collections process if energy prices increased by another x percent?”, “If x thousand customers miss their next payment, what is the impact to cash flow?”, “If we move x customers to a more affordable service plan, what is the impact to the P&L?” can all be modelled at a portfolio level and the appropriate actions / decisions taken at a customer or account level.
Business Outcome Simulation provides a safe space for analytical experimentation, provides a quick time to market and enables telecoms operators to refine their affordability decisions for new and existing customers.
Learn How FICO Can Help You Use Data and Analytics to Improve Customer Outcomes
- Read about how new analytics can help manage vulnerable customers
- Discover Why Friction Counts in Small Amounts
- Read the post Digital Decisioning Platforms - Your Secret for Transformational Success
Popular Posts
Average U.S. FICO® Score at 716, Indicating Improvement in Consumer Credit Behaviors Despite Pandemic
The FICO Score is a broad-based, independent standard measure of credit risk
Read more
The GSE Data Is Public. Here's What It Shows About Credit Score Modernization.
Independent Milliman analysis of GSE historical data confirms what anyone can now verify directly: FICO® Score 10T is the most predictive score.
Read more
FICO® Score High Achievers: Is Age the Only Factor?
<p>FICO’s latest research on <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/us-credit-quality-rising-the-beat-goes-on/" target="_blank">national FICO® Score distribution</a> shows that US credit quality continues to trend upwards, with an increasing number of consumers scoring in the highest scores ranges. Given that, we decided it was time to refresh our study on “<a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/infographic-what-does-a-high-credit-scorer-look-like/" target="_blank">FICO® Score high achievers</a>,” where we examine the credit behavioural profiles of consumers with higher credit scores.</p> <p>As expected, our latest study showed that older people generally have higher scores, as has been the case in our <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/age-before-beauty-credit-worthiness-before-youth/" target="_blank">past research</a>. This is largely because they have trade lines that have been open longer, which leads to higher scores (assuming the trade lines are in good standing and all other things equal). The most credit savvy among you will remember that length of credit history accounts for roughly 15% of the overall <a href="http://www.myfico.com/CreditEducation/WhatsInYourScore.aspx" target="_blank">FICO® Score calculation</a>.</p> <p>But for younger consumers, it isn’t too helpful to say, “just wait until you are 50 years old, and that will fix things!” Thus, I decided to dive deeper with our analysis, including looking at the credit behavioural characteristics of younger consumers with high FICO® Scores.</p> <p>In this analysis, I looked at credit characteristics for the two highest score bands, 750-799 and 800-850, which have about 16% and 23% of the population, respectively. I further broke this down by looking at the characteristics of the youngest 15% in each group, which occurs at age 29 for the 750-799 group and 43 for the 800-850. We used FICO<strong>®</strong> Score 9 for our analysis, and examined typical variables of the categories that go into the make-up of the score.</p> <p><a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-29367" src="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png" alt="fico-score-high-achiever-table" width="715" height="747" /></a></p> <p>Since there’s a lot to dissect in this chart, I’ll highlight a few findings that struck me: <ul> <li><strong>Credit history.</strong> Higher scores are undoubtedly associated with a longer time on file. What’s striking is the higher average time on file for the 800+ group, both overall and for revolving accounts (the most common trade line). Clearly, it helps to start credit use early in life – but that’s not the sole determining factor for high scoring. The younger cohorts in both the 800+ and 750-799 groups have time on file medians significantly less than their older counterparts.</li> <li><strong>New credit.</strong> High credit scorers do, in fact, pursue new credit. We see little variation in months since last trade line opening and last inquiry among all groups observed.</li> <li><strong>Pay on time.</strong> As you might expect, the further in the past the delinquency, the higher the score – and that’s <u>if</u> a delinquency ever happened. 95% of the 800+ people and 72% of the 750-799 group have never been delinquent, which is a striking contrast to the 57% for the total population. The percentages for the younger groups are even higher, especially so for the 750-799ers. Collection items are also scarce for these high scorers. While 23% of the national population have collection items greater than $99, the figures are only 0.5% for the 800+ group and 3% for the 750-799 group. It is clear that, in conjunction with starting a credit file early, paying on time is a key trait of the FICO® Score high achiever.</li> <li><strong>Balance and utilization.</strong> Finally, we look at how credit is being used, focusing on revolving product use. (Since most people only have one mortgage or one auto loan, variation in instalment product figures is minimal and driven by payment history, which is near perfect for high scorers, as we’ve seen.) FICO® Score high achievers tend to have more open revolving accounts. While the % active trades and utilization are generally lower, by no means do high scorers avoid the use of credit products. What drives the difference here is the amount of <u>available</u> revolving credit utilized. The 800+ group is roughly 1/4 of the national median, both in total and on their highest utilized card; they also have lower balances and more cards<em>. </em>The 750-799 group is more active and higher utilized, but still only at 2/3 of the national figures. The young 750-799 group compensate with lower revolving balances and, as a result, lower utilization, which is in line with what we see for the 800+ group.</li> <li><strong>Benchmarks.</strong> I’d like to point out that while this study provides good benchmarks of the typical credit traits of the FICO® Score high achiever, individual credit profiles will vary widely. And keep in mind that when we sort groups of consumers as a whole by different behaviours, some results may look superficially odd. For example, the 800+ band has a longer median average open account time (128 months) than average revolving months on file (140 months).</li> </ul> So, what do we conclude? A huge takeaway is that high scorers don’t have too much in the way of serious delinquencies and negative public record data.</p> <p>In most respects, the young 800+ people are like their peer group. They really only differ markedly in their shorter credit history and higher non-mortgage balance, both of which are a function of life stage. Our results show that you don’t have to be a credit product hermit; these high scorers have more credit cards. The takeaway is to start credit activity early and maintain well-managed and moderate usage.</p> <p>In many ways, the young 750-799 people are more interesting because their age profile is much younger. Their credit characteristics differ more from their peer group, particularly in terms of length of credit history. They compensate by having almost pristine credit records and lower balances.</p> <p>Ultimately, 39% of US consumers are FICO® Score high achievers, which they accomplish by following common-sense credit practices. It ain’t rocket science!</p>
Read moreTake the next step
Connect with FICO for answers to all your product and solution questions. Interested in becoming a business partner? Contact us to learn more. We look forward to hearing from you.