Reducing Health Care FWA Losses - Find Your Focus
A key component of stopping fraud, waste and abuse is to focus on your most productive targets: Who or what should be the focus of your payment integrity program?
Health care payers use a variety of strategies, tools and solutions to fight fraud, waste and abuse (FWA) in their fee-for-service healthcare claims. A key component of an effective payment integrity strategy is to focus on your most productive targets: Who or what should be the focus of your payment integrity program?
Here are some things to think about:
- Your payment policy and your claims adjudication system are designed to prevent inappropriate payments. However, no payment policy is perfect, no adjudication system is error-free, and the “bad guys” are always alert to weaknesses in your business. Your payment integrity program needs to be alert to your greatest weaknesses – the ways in which you leak the greatest amount of money in inappropriate payments.
- No payment integrity program will stop all of the FWA losses. Among other priorities, your goal is to control FWA losses at an appropriate level of loss. A common industry norm is 3% to 5% of your total annual paid. Embark upon a project that risk scores 12 months of historical paid claims using AI-based analytics which look for aberrancy, which is indicative of FWA across all lines, all members, all providers, all claims and all procedure codes. You will gain an enormous amount of insight into the strengths and weaknesses of the integrity of your payments for fee-for-service claims with this kind of project.
- Even when you are using powerful payment integrity technology, human resources are often a limiting factor in stopping FWA that eludes the controls of your payment policy and claims adjudication system. To maximize your results, you need to use your human resources to greatest effect by focusing their attention on the places where your payments are most at-risk.
- It’s easy to be distracted by the notion that your priority should be on addressing member or beneficiary FWA losses, but FWA perpetrated by members or beneficiaries isn’t where you’re leaking the most money. You’re typically leaking the most money to provider FWA and systemic weaknesses, including fraud as well as weaknesses in payment policy which are being exploited by providers, and errors in your adjudication and payment systems.
- The right payment integrity technology enables your limited human resources to most efficiently and effectively target the greatest opportunities for savings. A payment integrity solution with sophisticated technology like explainable artificial intelligence (xAI) and machine learning and robust decision management features and functions will direct your attention to your greatest risks – the most suspicious activity where the greatest amount of money is at risk. FICO’s Payment Integrity Platform, with its core component, FICO Insurance Fraud Manager, is an example of this kind of solution.
How do you most effectively target your payment integrity efforts?
The most effective approach to targeting your efforts is to score your claims, providers and procedures for likelihood of FWA using xAI and ML, and then sort your scored results to focus where the greatest amount of money is at risk.
An effective payment integrity strategy, like any part of your payment integrity program, depends upon having stakeholders from areas such as Legal, Claims Operations and Provider Relations on board. Engage your stakeholders in your strategy to maximize the results that you achieve in the mitigation of FWA losses.
Be prepared for change because the people who inappropriately take your money are entrepreneurial. Make sure that your payment integrity solution can keep up with the bad guys. Agile xAI and machine learning are features that will allow your solution to do this.
We welcome your comments. Stay tuned for my next post on health care fraud, waste and abuse.
Popular Posts
Average U.S. FICO® Score at 716, Indicating Improvement in Consumer Credit Behaviors Despite Pandemic
The FICO Score is a broad-based, independent standard measure of credit risk
Read more
The GSE Data Is Public. Here's What It Shows About Credit Score Modernization.
Independent Milliman analysis of GSE historical data confirms what anyone can now verify directly: FICO® Score 10T is the most predictive score.
Read more
FICO® Score High Achievers: Is Age the Only Factor?
<p>FICO’s latest research on <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/us-credit-quality-rising-the-beat-goes-on/" target="_blank">national FICO® Score distribution</a> shows that US credit quality continues to trend upwards, with an increasing number of consumers scoring in the highest scores ranges. Given that, we decided it was time to refresh our study on “<a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/infographic-what-does-a-high-credit-scorer-look-like/" target="_blank">FICO® Score high achievers</a>,” where we examine the credit behavioural profiles of consumers with higher credit scores.</p> <p>As expected, our latest study showed that older people generally have higher scores, as has been the case in our <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/age-before-beauty-credit-worthiness-before-youth/" target="_blank">past research</a>. This is largely because they have trade lines that have been open longer, which leads to higher scores (assuming the trade lines are in good standing and all other things equal). The most credit savvy among you will remember that length of credit history accounts for roughly 15% of the overall <a href="http://www.myfico.com/CreditEducation/WhatsInYourScore.aspx" target="_blank">FICO® Score calculation</a>.</p> <p>But for younger consumers, it isn’t too helpful to say, “just wait until you are 50 years old, and that will fix things!” Thus, I decided to dive deeper with our analysis, including looking at the credit behavioural characteristics of younger consumers with high FICO® Scores.</p> <p>In this analysis, I looked at credit characteristics for the two highest score bands, 750-799 and 800-850, which have about 16% and 23% of the population, respectively. I further broke this down by looking at the characteristics of the youngest 15% in each group, which occurs at age 29 for the 750-799 group and 43 for the 800-850. We used FICO<strong>®</strong> Score 9 for our analysis, and examined typical variables of the categories that go into the make-up of the score.</p> <p><a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-29367" src="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png" alt="fico-score-high-achiever-table" width="715" height="747" /></a></p> <p>Since there’s a lot to dissect in this chart, I’ll highlight a few findings that struck me: <ul> <li><strong>Credit history.</strong> Higher scores are undoubtedly associated with a longer time on file. What’s striking is the higher average time on file for the 800+ group, both overall and for revolving accounts (the most common trade line). Clearly, it helps to start credit use early in life – but that’s not the sole determining factor for high scoring. The younger cohorts in both the 800+ and 750-799 groups have time on file medians significantly less than their older counterparts.</li> <li><strong>New credit.</strong> High credit scorers do, in fact, pursue new credit. We see little variation in months since last trade line opening and last inquiry among all groups observed.</li> <li><strong>Pay on time.</strong> As you might expect, the further in the past the delinquency, the higher the score – and that’s <u>if</u> a delinquency ever happened. 95% of the 800+ people and 72% of the 750-799 group have never been delinquent, which is a striking contrast to the 57% for the total population. The percentages for the younger groups are even higher, especially so for the 750-799ers. Collection items are also scarce for these high scorers. While 23% of the national population have collection items greater than $99, the figures are only 0.5% for the 800+ group and 3% for the 750-799 group. It is clear that, in conjunction with starting a credit file early, paying on time is a key trait of the FICO® Score high achiever.</li> <li><strong>Balance and utilization.</strong> Finally, we look at how credit is being used, focusing on revolving product use. (Since most people only have one mortgage or one auto loan, variation in instalment product figures is minimal and driven by payment history, which is near perfect for high scorers, as we’ve seen.) FICO® Score high achievers tend to have more open revolving accounts. While the % active trades and utilization are generally lower, by no means do high scorers avoid the use of credit products. What drives the difference here is the amount of <u>available</u> revolving credit utilized. The 800+ group is roughly 1/4 of the national median, both in total and on their highest utilized card; they also have lower balances and more cards<em>. </em>The 750-799 group is more active and higher utilized, but still only at 2/3 of the national figures. The young 750-799 group compensate with lower revolving balances and, as a result, lower utilization, which is in line with what we see for the 800+ group.</li> <li><strong>Benchmarks.</strong> I’d like to point out that while this study provides good benchmarks of the typical credit traits of the FICO® Score high achiever, individual credit profiles will vary widely. And keep in mind that when we sort groups of consumers as a whole by different behaviours, some results may look superficially odd. For example, the 800+ band has a longer median average open account time (128 months) than average revolving months on file (140 months).</li> </ul> So, what do we conclude? A huge takeaway is that high scorers don’t have too much in the way of serious delinquencies and negative public record data.</p> <p>In most respects, the young 800+ people are like their peer group. They really only differ markedly in their shorter credit history and higher non-mortgage balance, both of which are a function of life stage. Our results show that you don’t have to be a credit product hermit; these high scorers have more credit cards. The takeaway is to start credit activity early and maintain well-managed and moderate usage.</p> <p>In many ways, the young 750-799 people are more interesting because their age profile is much younger. Their credit characteristics differ more from their peer group, particularly in terms of length of credit history. They compensate by having almost pristine credit records and lower balances.</p> <p>Ultimately, 39% of US consumers are FICO® Score high achievers, which they accomplish by following common-sense credit practices. It ain’t rocket science!</p>
Read moreTake the next step
Connect with FICO for answers to all your product and solution questions. Interested in becoming a business partner? Contact us to learn more. We look forward to hearing from you.