Which Consumer Segments Have Driven the Average FICO Score Higher Over the Past Decade?
A closer look at how much the national average FICO Score has been impacted by notable changes in the FICO scorable population
A few weeks ago, we announced that the average U.S. FICO® Score as of April 2019 is now 706, some 20 points higher than the national average score back in April 2009.
Key drivers of this trend are the steady economic growth experienced over this period, as well as improved financial behavior driven by consumer awareness of their FICO® Scores. An interesting and important question to ask is how much the national average FICO Score has been impacted by two notable changes in the FICO scorable population over the past decade:
- There are consumers who have stopped using traditional credit over the past decade who as a result are no longer FICO® scorable
- There are consumers who weren’t using credit back in 2009 but who have since established a sufficient credit history to meet the FICO minimum scoring criteria. The FICO minimum scoring criteria exists to ensure that there is sufficient – and sufficiently recent – information in the consumer’s credit file to support the generation of a reliable and accurate score.
When evaluated over the past decade, how large are these populations? Could one or both of these groups be key to understanding the increase in national average FICO® Score? We explore these questions below.
A Tale of Three Segments
There are three subsegments of the population that factor into the calculation of the national average U.S. FICO® Score as of April 2009 and/or April 2019:

Using a nationally representative sample of millions of U.S. consumers, we set about sizing and profiling each of these populations.
Credit Inactives
The first population is those who were FICO scorable as of April 2009, but are no longer FICO scorable as of April 2019. Generally speaking, this population was credit active as of April 2009, but over the subsequent 10 years became inactive, either through choice (‘credit retired’) or through lack of continued access to credit (‘credit impaired’). As of April 2019, many of these credit inactive consumers have not had an update to their credit file in years.
The FICO minimum scoring criteria requires that a credit file have at least one account update reported in the past 6 months. The purpose of the FICO minimum scoring criteria is to ensure that a score is only returned when there is sufficient information---and sufficient recent information---to support a reliable assessment of a consumer’s creditworthiness. Scoring credit inactives based on their substantially stale credit file information alone is a recipe for drawing inaccurate conclusions about the true level of credit risk posed by these consumers.
The duality of this credit inactive population can be observed in the FICO® Score distribution shown in Figure 2, which compares the distribution as of April 2009 for the credit inactives to the total population.

Note that there is high concentration of the credit inactive population in both the low (<550) and high (750+) score bins. This speaks to the different reasons that consumers might have been dropping out of the credit active population between 2009 and 2019. On the lower scoring end are the credit impaired, who likely faced significant financial struggles during the Great Recession, and as a result may have defaulted on most of their credit obligations and lost access to credit. Many on the higher scoring end are the now ‘credit retired’, who have an average age above 70 and between 2009 and 2019 voluntarily walked away from the use of credit.
We’ve sized this credit inactive population at over 40 million consumers, with an average score as of April 2009 of 660. Given the relatively low average score in comparison to the national figure, the fact that this population dropped from the scorable universe would have indeed helped to drive the overall average score higher.
New Entrants/Re-entrants
There were also consumers who entered the average FICO® Score calculation by becoming scorable over this period. Almost 90% of these consumers had credit files that were first established in the past 10 years; unsurprisingly, this population skews young, with a median age of 27. As has been covered previously here, younger consumers tend to have lower scores than other segments of the population. Not surprisingly then, the FICO® Score distribution of consumers who are “newly scorable” as of April 2019 skews lower than the total population (see figure 3).
We’ve sized this ‘newly scorable’ population at over 45 million consumers, with an average score as of April 2019 of 657. Given the relatively low average score in comparison to the national figure, the fact that this population entered the scorable universe is, if anything, driving the overall national average score lower.

In terms of impact on the shift in national average FICO® Score over the past decade, it seems that the credit inactives (who factored into the 2009 avg FICO calculation) and the newly scorable population (who factor into the 2019 avg FICO calculation) are more or less cancelling each other out. As covered above, both populations are of similar size, and have similar average scores. So that points to the third and final population as the real driver of the improvement in national average FICO® Score over the past decade.
‘Scorable Throughout’
In fact, the national average FICO® Score on those who were scorable as of 2009 and still scorable as of 2019 has increased from 694 to 723 over the past decade. This 29-point improvement outpaces the 20-point improvement that has been observed on the national level.
An analysis comparing key drivers of the FICO® Score (not to mention important consumer financial metrics) for this population reveals just how substantial the improvement over that decade has been.

Account-level delinquencies down double-digit percentages, substantially lower credit card utilization, lengthier credit histories, and less credit seeking activity — it is no surprise that this population has experienced a major improvement in their FICO® Score.
Coupled with the sheer size of this ‘scorable throughout’ population---roughly 160M consumers---it is clear that improvement in the credit profile of this population has been at the epicenter of the shift upwards in national average FICO® Score over the past decade.
Popular Posts
Average U.S. FICO® Score at 716, Indicating Improvement in Consumer Credit Behaviors Despite Pandemic
The FICO Score is a broad-based, independent standard measure of credit risk
Read more
The GSE Data Is Public. Here's What It Shows About Credit Score Modernization.
Independent Milliman analysis of GSE historical data confirms what anyone can now verify directly: FICO® Score 10T is the most predictive score.
Read more
FICO® Score High Achievers: Is Age the Only Factor?
<p>FICO’s latest research on <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/us-credit-quality-rising-the-beat-goes-on/" target="_blank">national FICO® Score distribution</a> shows that US credit quality continues to trend upwards, with an increasing number of consumers scoring in the highest scores ranges. Given that, we decided it was time to refresh our study on “<a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/infographic-what-does-a-high-credit-scorer-look-like/" target="_blank">FICO® Score high achievers</a>,” where we examine the credit behavioural profiles of consumers with higher credit scores.</p> <p>As expected, our latest study showed that older people generally have higher scores, as has been the case in our <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/age-before-beauty-credit-worthiness-before-youth/" target="_blank">past research</a>. This is largely because they have trade lines that have been open longer, which leads to higher scores (assuming the trade lines are in good standing and all other things equal). The most credit savvy among you will remember that length of credit history accounts for roughly 15% of the overall <a href="http://www.myfico.com/CreditEducation/WhatsInYourScore.aspx" target="_blank">FICO® Score calculation</a>.</p> <p>But for younger consumers, it isn’t too helpful to say, “just wait until you are 50 years old, and that will fix things!” Thus, I decided to dive deeper with our analysis, including looking at the credit behavioural characteristics of younger consumers with high FICO® Scores.</p> <p>In this analysis, I looked at credit characteristics for the two highest score bands, 750-799 and 800-850, which have about 16% and 23% of the population, respectively. I further broke this down by looking at the characteristics of the youngest 15% in each group, which occurs at age 29 for the 750-799 group and 43 for the 800-850. We used FICO<strong>®</strong> Score 9 for our analysis, and examined typical variables of the categories that go into the make-up of the score.</p> <p><a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-29367" src="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png" alt="fico-score-high-achiever-table" width="715" height="747" /></a></p> <p>Since there’s a lot to dissect in this chart, I’ll highlight a few findings that struck me: <ul> <li><strong>Credit history.</strong> Higher scores are undoubtedly associated with a longer time on file. What’s striking is the higher average time on file for the 800+ group, both overall and for revolving accounts (the most common trade line). Clearly, it helps to start credit use early in life – but that’s not the sole determining factor for high scoring. The younger cohorts in both the 800+ and 750-799 groups have time on file medians significantly less than their older counterparts.</li> <li><strong>New credit.</strong> High credit scorers do, in fact, pursue new credit. We see little variation in months since last trade line opening and last inquiry among all groups observed.</li> <li><strong>Pay on time.</strong> As you might expect, the further in the past the delinquency, the higher the score – and that’s <u>if</u> a delinquency ever happened. 95% of the 800+ people and 72% of the 750-799 group have never been delinquent, which is a striking contrast to the 57% for the total population. The percentages for the younger groups are even higher, especially so for the 750-799ers. Collection items are also scarce for these high scorers. While 23% of the national population have collection items greater than $99, the figures are only 0.5% for the 800+ group and 3% for the 750-799 group. It is clear that, in conjunction with starting a credit file early, paying on time is a key trait of the FICO® Score high achiever.</li> <li><strong>Balance and utilization.</strong> Finally, we look at how credit is being used, focusing on revolving product use. (Since most people only have one mortgage or one auto loan, variation in instalment product figures is minimal and driven by payment history, which is near perfect for high scorers, as we’ve seen.) FICO® Score high achievers tend to have more open revolving accounts. While the % active trades and utilization are generally lower, by no means do high scorers avoid the use of credit products. What drives the difference here is the amount of <u>available</u> revolving credit utilized. The 800+ group is roughly 1/4 of the national median, both in total and on their highest utilized card; they also have lower balances and more cards<em>. </em>The 750-799 group is more active and higher utilized, but still only at 2/3 of the national figures. The young 750-799 group compensate with lower revolving balances and, as a result, lower utilization, which is in line with what we see for the 800+ group.</li> <li><strong>Benchmarks.</strong> I’d like to point out that while this study provides good benchmarks of the typical credit traits of the FICO® Score high achiever, individual credit profiles will vary widely. And keep in mind that when we sort groups of consumers as a whole by different behaviours, some results may look superficially odd. For example, the 800+ band has a longer median average open account time (128 months) than average revolving months on file (140 months).</li> </ul> So, what do we conclude? A huge takeaway is that high scorers don’t have too much in the way of serious delinquencies and negative public record data.</p> <p>In most respects, the young 800+ people are like their peer group. They really only differ markedly in their shorter credit history and higher non-mortgage balance, both of which are a function of life stage. Our results show that you don’t have to be a credit product hermit; these high scorers have more credit cards. The takeaway is to start credit activity early and maintain well-managed and moderate usage.</p> <p>In many ways, the young 750-799 people are more interesting because their age profile is much younger. Their credit characteristics differ more from their peer group, particularly in terms of length of credit history. They compensate by having almost pristine credit records and lower balances.</p> <p>Ultimately, 39% of US consumers are FICO® Score high achievers, which they accomplish by following common-sense credit practices. It ain’t rocket science!</p>
Read moreTake the next step
Connect with FICO for answers to all your product and solution questions. Interested in becoming a business partner? Contact us to learn more. We look forward to hearing from you.