Implementation
We are using the following algorithm for modeling and solving this problem:
Define the MIP machine assignment problem. Define the operations of the CP model. Start the MIP Branch-and-Bound search. At every node of the MIP search: while function generate_cuts returns true re-solve the LP-relaxation Function generate_cuts for all machines m call generate_cut_machine(m) if at least one cut has been generated Return true otherwise Return false Function generate_cut_machine(m) Collect all operations assigned to machine m if more than one operation assigned to m Solve the CP sequencing problem for m if sequencing succeeds Save the solution otherwise Add an infeasibility cut for machine m to the MIP |
The implementation of this model is split into two Mosel models: the first, sched_main.mos, contains the MIP master problem and the definition of the cut generation algorithm. The second model, sched_sub.mos, implements the CP single machine sequencing model.
The first part of the master model sets up the data arrays, compiles and loads the CP submodel, calls subroutines for the model definition and problem solving, and finally produces some summary result output. We have defined the filename of the data file as a parameter to be able to change the name of the data file at the execution of the model without having to change the model source. Correspondingly, all data, including the sizes of index sets, are read in from file. At first, we read in only the values of NP and NM. Subsequently, when declaring the sets and arrays that make use of these values, NP and NM are known and the arrays are created as fixed arrays. Otherwise, if their indexing sets are not known, these arrays would automatically be declared as dynamic arrays and for all but arrays of basic types (real, integer, etc.) we have to create their entries explicitly.
model "Schedule (MIP + CP) master problem" uses "mmsystem", "mmxprs", "mmjobs" parameters DATAFILE = "Data/sched_3_12.dat" VERBOSE = 1 end-parameters forward procedure define_MIP_model forward procedure setup_cutmanager forward public function generate_cuts: boolean forward public procedure print_solution declarations NP: integer ! Number of operations (products) NM: integer ! Number of machines end-declarations initializations from DATAFILE NP NM end-initializations declarations PRODS = 1..NP ! Set of products MACH = 1..NM ! Set of machines REL: array(PRODS) of integer ! Release dates of orders DUE: array(PRODS) of integer ! Due dates of orders MAX_LOAD: integer ! max_p DUE(p) - min_p REL(p) COST: array(PRODS,MACH) of integer ! Processing cost of products DUR: array(PRODS,MACH) of integer ! Processing times of products starttime: real ! Measure program execution time ctcut: integer ! Counter for cuts solstart: array(PRODS) of integer ! **** MIP model: use: array(PRODS,MACH) of mpvar ! 1 if p uses machine m, otherwise 0 Cost: linctr ! Objective function totsolve,totCP: real ! Time measurement ctrun: integer ! Counter of CP runs CPmodel: Model ! Reference to the CP sequencing model ev: Event ! Event EVENT_SOLVED=2 ! Event codes sent by submodels EVENT_FAILED=3 end-declarations ! Read data from file initializations from DATAFILE REL DUE COST DUR end-initializations ! **** Problem definition **** define_MIP_model ! Definition of the MIP model res:=compile("sched_sub.mos") ! Compile the CP model load(CPmodel, "sched_sub.bim") ! Load the CP model ! **** Solution algorithm **** starttime:= gettime setup_cutmanager ! Settings for the MIP search totsolve:= 0.0 initializations to "raw:" totsolve as "shmem:solvetime" REL as "shmem:REL" DUE as "shmem:DUE" end-initializations minimize(Cost) ! Solve the problem writeln("Number of cuts generated: ", ctcut) writeln("(", gettime-starttime, "sec) Best solution value: ", getobjval) initializations from "raw:" totsolve as "shmem:solvetime" end-initializations writeln("Total CP solve time: ", totsolve) writeln("Total CP time: ", totCP) writeln("CP runs: ", ctrun)
The MIP model corresponds closely to the mathematical model that we have seen in the previous section.
procedure define_MIP_model ! Objective: total processing cost Cost:= sum(p in PRODS, m in MACH) COST(p,m) * use(p,m) ! Each order needs exactly one machine for processing forall(p in PRODS) sum(m in MACH) use(p,m) = 1 ! Valid inequalities for strengthening the LP relaxation MAX_LOAD:= max(p in PRODS) DUE(p) - min(p in PRODS) REL(p) forall(m in MACH) sum(p in PRODS) DUR(p,m) * use(p,m) <= MAX_LOAD forall(p in PRODS, m in MACH) use(p,m) is_binary end-procedure
The cut generation callback function generate_cuts is called at least once per MIP node. For every machine, it checks whether the assigned operations can be scheduled or whether an infeasibility cut needs to be added. If any cuts have been added, the LP relaxation needs to be re-solved and the cut generation function will be called again, until no more cuts are added. It is important to set and re-set the values of XPRS_solutionfile as shown in our example at the beginning and end of this function if it accesses Xpress Optimizer solution values.
The function generate_cut_machine first collects all tasks that have been assigned to the given machine m into the set ProdMach by calling the procedure products_on_machine. If there are still unassigned tasks the returned set is empty, otherwise, if the set has more than one element it tries to solve the sequencing subproblem (function solve_CP_problem). If this problem cannot be solved, then the function adds a cut to the MIP problem that makes the current assignment of operations to this machine infeasible.
procedure products_on_machine(m: integer, ProdMach: set of integer) forall(p in PRODS) do val:=getsol(use(p,m)) if (val > 0 and val < 1) then ProdMach:={} break elif val>0.5 then ProdMach+={p} end-if end-do end-procedure !----------------------------------------------------------------- ! Generate a cut for machine m if the sequencing subproblem is infeasible function generate_cut_machine(m: integer): boolean declarations ProdMach: set of integer end-declarations ! Collect the operations assigned to machine m products_on_machine(m, ProdMach) ! Solve the sequencing problem (CP model): if solved, save the solution, ! otherwise add an infeasibility cut to the MIP problem size:= getsize(ProdMach) returned:= false if (size>1) then if not solve_CP_problem(m, ProdMach, 1) then Cut:= sum(p in ProdMach) use(p,m) - (size-1) if VERBOSE > 2 then writeln(m,": ", ProdMach, " <= ", size-1) end-if addcut(1, CT_LEQ, Cut) returned:= true end-if end-if end-function !----------------------------------------------------------------- ! Cut generation callback function public function generate_cuts: boolean returned:=false; ctcutold:=ctcut setparam("XPRS_solutionfile", 0) forall(m in MACH) do if generate_cut_machine(m) then returned:=true ! Call function again for this node ctcut+=1 end-if end-do setparam("XPRS_solutionfile", 1) if returned and VERBOSE>1 then writeln("Node ", getparam("XPRS_NODES"), ": ", ctcut-ctcutold, " cut(s) added") end-if end-function
The solving of the CP model is started from the function solve_CP_problem that writes out the necessary data to shared memory and starts the execution of the submodel contained in the file sched_sub.mos.
function solve_CP_problem(m: integer, ProdMach: set of integer, mode: integer): boolean declarations DURm: dynamic array(range) of integer sol: dynamic array(range) of integer solvetime: real end-declarations ! Data for CP model forall(p in ProdMach) DURm(p):= DUR(p,m) initializations to "raw:" ProdMach as "shmem:ProdMach" DURm as "shmem:DURm" end-initializations ! Solve the problem and retrieve the solution if it is feasible startsolve:= gettime returned:= false if(getstatus(CPmodel)=RT_RUNNING) then fflush writeln("CPmodel is running") fflush exit(1) end-if ctrun+=1 run(CPmodel, "NP=" + NP + ",VERBOSE=" + VERBOSE + ",MODE=" + mode) wait ! Wait for a message from the submodel ev:= getnextevent ! Retrieve the event if getclass(ev)=EVENT_SOLVED then returned:= true if mode = 2 then initializations from "raw:" sol as "shmem:solstart" end-initializations forall(p in ProdMach) solstart(p):=sol(p) end-if elif getclass(ev)<>EVENT_FAILED then writeln("Problem with Kalis") exit(2) end-if wait dropnextevent ! Ignore "submodel finished" event totCP+= (gettime-startsolve) end-function
We complete the MIP model with settings for the cut manager and the definition of the integer solution callback. The Mosel comparison tolerance is set to a slightly larger value than the tolerance applied by Xpress Optimizer. It is important to switch the LP presolve off since we interfere with the matrix during the execution of the algorithm (alternatively, it is possible to fine-tune presolve to use only non-destructive algorithms). Sufficiently large space for cuts and cut coefficients should be reserved in the matrix. We also enable output printing by the Optimizer and choose among different MIP log frequencies (depending on model parameter VERBOSE.
procedure setup_cutmanager setparam("XPRS_CUTSTRATEGY", 0) ! Disable automatic cuts feastol:= getparam("XPRS_FEASTOL") ! Get Optimizer zero tolerance setparam("zerotol", feastol * 10) ! Set comparison tolerance of Mosel setparam("XPRS_PRESOLVE", 0) ! Disable presolve setparam("XPRS_MIPPRESOLVE", 0) ! Disable MIP presolve command("KEEPARTIFICIALS=0") ! No global red. cost fixing setparam("XPRS_SBBEST", 0) ! Turn strong branching off setparam("XPRS_HEURSTRATEGY", 0) ! Disable MIP heuristics setparam("XPRS_EXTRAROWS", 10000) ! Reserve space for cuts setparam("XPRS_EXTRAELEMS", NP*30000) ! ... and cut coefficients setcallback(XPRS_CB_CUTMGR, "generate_cuts") ! Define the cut mgr. callback setcallback(XPRS_CB_INTSOL, "print_solution") ! Define the integer sol. cb. setparam("XPRS_COLORDER", 2) case VERBOSE of 1: do setparam("XPRS_VERBOSE", true) setparam("XPRS_MIPLOG", -200) end-do 2: do setparam("XPRS_VERBOSE", true) setparam("XPRS_MIPLOG", -100) end-do 3: do ! Detailed MIP output setparam("XPRS_VERBOSE", true) setparam("XPRS_MIPLOG", 3) end-do end-case end-procedure
The definition of the integer solution callback is, in parts, similar to the function generate_cut_machine. To obtain a detailed solution output we need to re-solve all CP subproblems, this time with run MODE two, meaning that the CP model writes its solution information to shared memory.
public procedure print_solution declarations ProdMach: set of integer end-declarations writeln("(",gettime-starttime, "sec) Solution ", getparam("XPRS_MIPSOLS"), ": Cost: ", getsol(Cost)) if VERBOSE > 1 then forall(p in PRODS) do forall(m in MACH) write(getsol(use(p,m))," ") writeln end-do end-if if VERBOSE > 0 then forall(m in MACH) do ProdMach:= {} ! Collect the operations assigned to machine m products_on_machine(m, ProdMach) Size:= getsize(ProdMach) if Size > 1 then ! (Re)solve the CP sequencing problem if not solve_CP_problem(m, ProdMach, 2) then writeln("Something wrong here: ", m, ProdMach) end-if elif Size=1 then elem:=min(p in ProdMach) p solstart(elem):=REL(elem) end-if end-do ! Print out the result forall(p in PRODS) do msol:=sum(m in MACH) m*getsol(use(p,m)) writeln(p, " -> ", msol,": ", strfmt(solstart(p),2), " - ", strfmt(DUR(p,round(msol))+solstart(p),2), " [", REL(p), ", ", DUE(p), "]") end-do writeln("Time: ", gettime - starttime, "sec") writeln fflush end-if end-procedure
The following code listing shows the complete CP submodel. At every execution, the set of tasks assigned to one machine and the corresponding durations are read from shared memory. The disjunctions between pairs of tasks are posted explicitly to be able to stop the addition of constraints if an infeasibility is detected during the definition of the problem. The search stops at the first feasible solution. If a solution was found, it is passed back to the master model if the model parameter MODE has the value two. In every case, after termination of the CP search the submodel sends a solution status event back to the master model.
model "Schedule (MIP + CP) CP subproblem" uses "kalis", "mmjobs" , "mmsystem" parameters VERBOSE = 1 NP = 12 ! Number of products MODE = 1 ! 1 - decide feasibility ! 2 - return complete solution end-parameters startsolve:= gettime declarations PRODS = 1..NP ! Set of products ProdMach: set of integer end-declarations initializations from "raw:" ProdMach as "shmem:ProdMach" end-initializations finalize(ProdMach) declarations REL: array(PRODS) of integer ! Release dates of orders DUE: array(PRODS) of integer ! Due dates of orders DURm: array(ProdMach) of integer ! Processing times on machine m solstart: array(ProdMach) of integer ! Solution values for start times start: array(ProdMach) of cpvar ! Start times of tasks Disj: array(range) of cpctr ! Disjunctive constraints Strategy: array(range) of cpbranching ! Enumeration strategy EVENT_SOLVED=2 ! Event codes sent by submodels EVENT_FAILED=3 solvetime: real end-declarations initializations from "raw:" DURm as "shmem:DURm" REL as "shmem:REL" DUE as "shmem:DUE" end-initializations ! Bounds on start times forall(p in ProdMach) setdomain(start(p), REL(p), DUE(p)-DURm(p)) ! Disjunctive constraint ct:= 1 forall(p,q in ProdMach| p<q) do Disj(ct):= start(p) + DURm(p) <= start(q) or start(q) + DURm(q) <= start(p) ct+= 1 end-do ! Post disjunctions to the solver nDisj:= ct; j:=1; res:= true while (res and j<nDisj) do res:= cp_post(Disj(j)) j+=1 end-do ! Solve the problem if res then Strategy(1):= settle_disjunction(Disj) Strategy(2):= assign_and_forbid(KALIS_SMALLEST_DOMAIN, KALIS_MIN_TO_MAX, start) cp_set_branching(Strategy) res:= cp_find_next_sol end-if ! Pass solution to master problem if res then forall(p in ProdMach) solstart(p):= getsol(start(p)) if MODE=2 then initializations to "raw:" solstart as "shmem:solstart" end-initializations end-if send(EVENT_SOLVED,0) else send(EVENT_FAILED,0) end-if ! Update total running time measurement initializations from "raw:" solvetime as "shmem:solvetime" end-initializations solvetime+= gettime-startsolve initializations to "raw:" solvetime as "shmem:solvetime" end-initializations end-model
© 2001-2019 Fair Isaac Corporation. All rights reserved. This documentation is the property of Fair Isaac Corporation (“FICO”). Receipt or possession of this documentation does not convey rights to disclose, reproduce, make derivative works, use, or allow others to use it except solely for internal evaluation purposes to determine whether to purchase a license to the software described in this documentation, or as otherwise set forth in a written software license agreement between you and FICO (or a FICO affiliate). Use of this documentation and the software described in it must conform strictly to the foregoing permitted uses, and no other use is permitted.