4 Steps Credit Unions Can Take to Be More Member-Centric
Credit unions set the standard for knowing and understanding their customers. They know about the importance and uniqueness of the member relationship. However, building the member…
Credit unions set the standard for knowing and understanding their customers. They know about the importance and uniqueness of the member relationship. However, building the member profile and using this information in order to drive customer-focused decisions can be challenging. Identifying the stages of member-centric management and leveraging the data available at each stage is the first step to being more member-centric.
Traditional Model versus Member-Centric Model
Historically in the United States, member management was done at the account level using the Traditional Model. Products were managed by separate groups or silos, and information about the accountholder was not shared between these silos. In this Traditional Model, an accountholder could be in an overdraft status on their checking account and, because the information was not made available to other areas, a cash withdrawal against the credit card could be approved. The result would be inconsistent member treatment and uncontrolled risk.
Retail lenders across the globe have, in recent years, pursued an alternative approach which encapsulates the full customer relationship and can be referred to as the member-centric model. The Member Centric Model is designed to share information across product silos and communication channels. The result is a unified product and channel view of the member that can be used in the management of the individual member accounts. In our previous example, the over-drafted member was approved for a cash transaction on their credit card. In the Member Centric Model, information about the overdraft status of the account would be made available across all products and channels resulting in consistent treatment across all member contacts. The member-centric model can simultaneously improve risk management and improve the member experience.
For credit unions not already managing in a unified manner, going from an account level to a member level design can be intimidating. The good news is that benefits can be derived at any of the intermediate stages of member centricity. A thorough understanding of each of the stages and the associated benefits follows.
There are four basic steps of member management and each of the steps provides unique benefits to the credit union. I review each step based these questions:
- What are my goals for this account?
- What data do I need to make a decision?
- What kinds of decisions should I be making?
- What benefits should I anticipate?
Step 1 – Account Management In an account management design, the decisions and treatments applied to an account is based primarily on data associated with the history of that singular account. For example, in a credit card account only information about the member’s credit card behavior is used to make decisions such as credit line adjustments, approve decline decisions or collection contact strategies, just to name a few.
Goal: Effectively manage risk and loss at the account level.
Data Needed: Account-only relationship, transactional, and payment data plus any account level score models
Decisions: Automated account-level decisions such as line management, authorizations, pricing and collections to name a few
Benefits: Decisions are automated and account history can be modeled to predict future performance and direct future actions
Step 2 – Account Management with Enterprise Data At step 2, decisions are also managed at the account level. The difference is that member level data is introduced into the model and the logic that leads to the decision is made based on a wider scope of information. The decisions made are still at the account level only, and now account history is complemented with relevant data spanning the full member relationship. This is a very common stage of customer-centric management in the United States.
Goal: Make more informed decisions to build relationships and manage risk and loss
Data Needed: Relationship, transactional, payment, and performance data on all member accounts
Decisions: Automated account-level decisions based on performance across all lines of business
Benefits: Account level decisions become more consistent and are based on the full membership relationship
Step 3 – Member Management (one line of business) At this level, the credit union is using data for a single business line (such as a revolving product line like credit card) and decisions are made at the line of business level rather than the account level. For example, for members with multiple credit card accounts, credit line management decisions are made at the member level and then the lines are distributed to each of the member’s credit cards.
Goal: Cohesive management of single line of business, including management of aggregate exposure, risk and loss metrics
Data Needed: Product-level data for an individual member; for example, if member has multiple auto loans with credit union, collecting and using the data for all of these loans when making decisions
Decisions: Applying treatments at the product level for each member. For example, if a member has multiple auto loans in collections, combining the collection efforts into a single treatment rather than separate contacts for each of the delinquent loans.
Benefits: A product level view of each member that ensures consistent treatment of similar member accounts
Step 4 – Enterprise Member Management At this stage the credit union is using the complete member relationship profile to review and make decisions. This could be multiple occurrences of multiple products, for example 3 credit cards, 1 mortgage, 2 auto loans, a HELOC, a savings and a checking account. Having this depth of insight into the relationship as well as the history that the member has with the credit union enables the achievement of a holistic style of member management that would allow for consistent and appropriate treatment for a member in every aspect of the relationship.
Goal: Growth of the member relationship
Data Needed: Member account data across all relationships
Decisions: Member-level exposure across all product lines distributed at the account level, member-level line management, collections, and marketing
Benefits: Consistent and cohesive member treatment across all products and all contact channels, deepening of the member relationship
Putting it All Together What stage of member management are you at today? Have you tapped into the value of the member-centric model?
Keep in mind that the benefits of member management are obtainable at each step of the way. Building a solid relationship with your members starts with an evaluation of your current policies, processes, and member touch-points. Moving through the stages of member engagement and member centricity redefines the relationship you have with your member base . . . so you can become a true financial partner to your members.
Popular Posts
Average U.S. FICO® Score at 716, Indicating Improvement in Consumer Credit Behaviors Despite Pandemic
The FICO Score is a broad-based, independent standard measure of credit risk
Read more
The GSE Data Is Public. Here's What It Shows About Credit Score Modernization.
Independent Milliman analysis of GSE historical data confirms what anyone can now verify directly: FICO® Score 10T is the most predictive score.
Read more
FICO® Score High Achievers: Is Age the Only Factor?
<p>FICO’s latest research on <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/us-credit-quality-rising-the-beat-goes-on/" target="_blank">national FICO® Score distribution</a> shows that US credit quality continues to trend upwards, with an increasing number of consumers scoring in the highest scores ranges. Given that, we decided it was time to refresh our study on “<a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/infographic-what-does-a-high-credit-scorer-look-like/" target="_blank">FICO® Score high achievers</a>,” where we examine the credit behavioural profiles of consumers with higher credit scores.</p> <p>As expected, our latest study showed that older people generally have higher scores, as has been the case in our <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/age-before-beauty-credit-worthiness-before-youth/" target="_blank">past research</a>. This is largely because they have trade lines that have been open longer, which leads to higher scores (assuming the trade lines are in good standing and all other things equal). The most credit savvy among you will remember that length of credit history accounts for roughly 15% of the overall <a href="http://www.myfico.com/CreditEducation/WhatsInYourScore.aspx" target="_blank">FICO® Score calculation</a>.</p> <p>But for younger consumers, it isn’t too helpful to say, “just wait until you are 50 years old, and that will fix things!” Thus, I decided to dive deeper with our analysis, including looking at the credit behavioural characteristics of younger consumers with high FICO® Scores.</p> <p>In this analysis, I looked at credit characteristics for the two highest score bands, 750-799 and 800-850, which have about 16% and 23% of the population, respectively. I further broke this down by looking at the characteristics of the youngest 15% in each group, which occurs at age 29 for the 750-799 group and 43 for the 800-850. We used FICO<strong>®</strong> Score 9 for our analysis, and examined typical variables of the categories that go into the make-up of the score.</p> <p><a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-29367" src="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png" alt="fico-score-high-achiever-table" width="715" height="747" /></a></p> <p>Since there’s a lot to dissect in this chart, I’ll highlight a few findings that struck me: <ul> <li><strong>Credit history.</strong> Higher scores are undoubtedly associated with a longer time on file. What’s striking is the higher average time on file for the 800+ group, both overall and for revolving accounts (the most common trade line). Clearly, it helps to start credit use early in life – but that’s not the sole determining factor for high scoring. The younger cohorts in both the 800+ and 750-799 groups have time on file medians significantly less than their older counterparts.</li> <li><strong>New credit.</strong> High credit scorers do, in fact, pursue new credit. We see little variation in months since last trade line opening and last inquiry among all groups observed.</li> <li><strong>Pay on time.</strong> As you might expect, the further in the past the delinquency, the higher the score – and that’s <u>if</u> a delinquency ever happened. 95% of the 800+ people and 72% of the 750-799 group have never been delinquent, which is a striking contrast to the 57% for the total population. The percentages for the younger groups are even higher, especially so for the 750-799ers. Collection items are also scarce for these high scorers. While 23% of the national population have collection items greater than $99, the figures are only 0.5% for the 800+ group and 3% for the 750-799 group. It is clear that, in conjunction with starting a credit file early, paying on time is a key trait of the FICO® Score high achiever.</li> <li><strong>Balance and utilization.</strong> Finally, we look at how credit is being used, focusing on revolving product use. (Since most people only have one mortgage or one auto loan, variation in instalment product figures is minimal and driven by payment history, which is near perfect for high scorers, as we’ve seen.) FICO® Score high achievers tend to have more open revolving accounts. While the % active trades and utilization are generally lower, by no means do high scorers avoid the use of credit products. What drives the difference here is the amount of <u>available</u> revolving credit utilized. The 800+ group is roughly 1/4 of the national median, both in total and on their highest utilized card; they also have lower balances and more cards<em>. </em>The 750-799 group is more active and higher utilized, but still only at 2/3 of the national figures. The young 750-799 group compensate with lower revolving balances and, as a result, lower utilization, which is in line with what we see for the 800+ group.</li> <li><strong>Benchmarks.</strong> I’d like to point out that while this study provides good benchmarks of the typical credit traits of the FICO® Score high achiever, individual credit profiles will vary widely. And keep in mind that when we sort groups of consumers as a whole by different behaviours, some results may look superficially odd. For example, the 800+ band has a longer median average open account time (128 months) than average revolving months on file (140 months).</li> </ul> So, what do we conclude? A huge takeaway is that high scorers don’t have too much in the way of serious delinquencies and negative public record data.</p> <p>In most respects, the young 800+ people are like their peer group. They really only differ markedly in their shorter credit history and higher non-mortgage balance, both of which are a function of life stage. Our results show that you don’t have to be a credit product hermit; these high scorers have more credit cards. The takeaway is to start credit activity early and maintain well-managed and moderate usage.</p> <p>In many ways, the young 750-799 people are more interesting because their age profile is much younger. Their credit characteristics differ more from their peer group, particularly in terms of length of credit history. They compensate by having almost pristine credit records and lower balances.</p> <p>Ultimately, 39% of US consumers are FICO® Score high achievers, which they accomplish by following common-sense credit practices. It ain’t rocket science!</p>
Read moreTake the next step
Connect with FICO for answers to all your product and solution questions. Interested in becoming a business partner? Contact us to learn more. We look forward to hearing from you.