Which Is Harder: Customer Centricity or Solving a Rubik’s Cube?
Achieving customer centricity without a decisioning platform can be as hit-or-miss as solving a Rubik’s Cube and its quintillion possible combinations

There’s a fun 40-minute documentary on Netflix called “The Speed Cubers,” about people for whom competitive Rubik’s Cube solving is somewhat of an obsession. And it holds some useful parallels for those who may find themselves responsible for solving their companies’ digital transformation and customer centricity challenges.
First, here’s some interesting Rubik’s Cube statistics:
- There are more than 43 quintillion possible configurations of the Rubik's Cube… that’s 43 billion-billion, or 43 followed by 18 zeroes.
- It takes the average person – those willing to stick with it – about three hours to solve the Rubik’s Cube the first time they try.
- Speed Cubers are two orders of magnitude faster: the world’s record is just 3.47 seconds, solving The Cube in as few as 20 moves. (In the time it took you to read that sentence, there are people who have solved a fully-scrambled Rubik’s Cube.)
- But as fast as humans are, a machine developed by engineers at MIT managed to solve a Rubik’s cube in just 0.38 seconds – almost 10 times faster than the fastest humans – using machine-learning, robotics, and two Sony® PlayStation Eye® cameras.
Logic and Process Prevail When Solving Complex Problems
Given that the number of possible “wrong” configurations outnumber the single “right” configuration 43 quintillion-to-one, how is it even possible unscramble a Rubik’s Cube so quickly?
As with any multivariate mathematical problem, the solution lies in solving the most important variables first and using them to help extrapolate values for the smaller ones.
Think about a jigsaw puzzle: you start by putting the corner and edge pieces into place, right? It is the same thing with a Rubik’s Cube, only the eight “corners” are those with three colored sides; the 12 “edges” only have two, and the six center pieces have only one (and it is handy to know that those are in a fixed position relative to one another.)
With those constraints in mind, Speed Cubers – human and machine – solve Rubik’s Cube configurations section-by-section, using one of hundreds of memorized sequences of moves they call “algorithms,” each corresponding to a different arrangement of colored squares on the cube. Relying on simple pattern recognition, when a Speed Cuber or a robot sees an arrangement they recognize, they instinctively respond with the corresponding algorithm, each bringing the cube one step closer to being solved. The more experience you have, the faster you can arrive at the solution.
43 Quadrillion Possibilities… But Only One Right Answer
What does mean to companies trying to solve complex decisioning problems? Though automated systems are able to perform calculations and solve problems far faster humans, there is one very important difference between unscrambling a Rubik’s Cube and making good business decisions: when unscrambling a Rubik’s Cube, there is only one right solution, namely, getting all six sides the same color. But in business decisioning, there could a myriad of possible “solutions,” most of which are good, but only one is optimal.
In data-intensive industries like insurance and financial services, there are even more moving parts to a decision than just the 54 squares on a Rubik’s Cube. For large corporations, it’s not uncommon to have tens of thousands of employees trying to make real-time decisions involving millions of customers and billions of dollars. Or supply chains that incorporate hundreds of SKUs, involving thousands of suppliers and shipping destinations.
Companies struggle with balancing costs, personnel, responsiveness, inventory, competition, and other business pressures, especially since most of them come at the expense of the others.
Because many of these functions are automated, at least at a departmental level, you would initially think that striking the right balance is a problem for the IT department; but you would only half-right: the rest of the solution lies with business users, people with working, front-line (or “heuristic”) knowledge of customers, suppliers, distributors, etc., to infuse the street-smarts needed for book-smart technology.
Just like using algorithms to solve a Rubik’s Cube, in the corporate world, business rules, analytics, and validated data must all work together – not just from one or two departments, but from across the entire enterprise – can help companies quickly find the “corner pieces” of the best possible solutions.
Keep the Customer at the Center
Of course, the end goal of all of this to enable companies to make smarter, faster, more profitable decisions surrounding customer relationships, for the duration of the lifecycle. This is achieved via what industry experts call “Customer Centricity,” synergizing your people, processes, and technology in a personalized manner around every customer, made possible by the new apex of decisioning, “Centralized Decisioning.”
It sounds costly and complicated but it’s really quite methodical, involving:
- Unifying and mobilizing the enterprise: Employing a unified, scalable decision platform that weaponizes all information from across the enterprise, so holistic decisions occur at every customer touchpoint across the lifecycle.
- Ensuring a personalized user experience: Hyper-personalized user experiences – like we all expect today, thanks to Amazon, Netflix, and Google – lead to higher customer satisfaction, which leads to improved customer retention… the key to extending the customer lifecycle, and maximizing share-of-wallet throughout.
- Broadening and optimizing the use of knowledge assets that enables enterprises to re-use and leverage connected decision assets across the customer lifecycle. This gives companies the ability to create customized, target decisioning strategies that are consistent, transparent, and expandable as needed over time.
Simulation and Optimization: Know Before You Go
Once these assets are synergized, simulation and optimization come into the picture: they allow companies to quickly solve complex multivariate problems under a wide range of scenarios, adjust variables and parameters, and iteratively fine-tune a simulation to engineer the optimal outcome… not just “good” ones, but the “optimal” one.
Simulation and optimization are not new – they have been in the realm of data scientists and operations researchers for some time – but two important aspects are very different from tools of the past:
- The scope and speed of problem-solving is dramatically improved over previous generation offerings. Today’s systems can solve far more complex problems, involving a much high number of variables, and virtually any sort of structured or unstructured data – in real-time – than was imaginable just a few years ago.
- Simulation and optimization are no longer the exclusive purview of data scientists and operations researchers:. The fastest growth in analytics is now occurring among business users, working both independently and in parallel with their in-house technical colleagues.
All of these come together create a synergistic, upward spiral for the business: by empowering business users to manage their own analytics strategies, more scenarios can be explored, faster than ever before… which means higher odds of finding winning strategies. This democratization of analytics also frees data scientists and operations researchers to focus their talents on bigger, higher-ROI strategies. This is a win-win for companies and their customers, because moving significant portions of analytics strategy to the business side of the house results in the most customer-friendly possible plans and programs.
So, while solving your most challenging business and operations problems may feel like a Rubik’s Cube, rest assured that – armed with the right data, in the hands of the right people, processes, and technology – the perfect answer is a lot closer than your think.
FICO is a recognized leader in enterprise decisioning with a proven track record in helping clients across all industries achieve their digital transformation goals. For more information on please visit our new Digital Transformation Hub. For industry-specific information, visit our our Centralized Decisioning solutions for financial services and insurance.
Popular Posts
Average U.S. FICO® Score at 716, Indicating Improvement in Consumer Credit Behaviors Despite Pandemic
The FICO Score is a broad-based, independent standard measure of credit risk
Read more
The GSE Data Is Public. Here's What It Shows About Credit Score Modernization.
Independent Milliman analysis of GSE historical data confirms what anyone can now verify directly: FICO® Score 10T is the most predictive score.
Read more
FICO® Score High Achievers: Is Age the Only Factor?
<p>FICO’s latest research on <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/us-credit-quality-rising-the-beat-goes-on/" target="_blank">national FICO® Score distribution</a> shows that US credit quality continues to trend upwards, with an increasing number of consumers scoring in the highest scores ranges. Given that, we decided it was time to refresh our study on “<a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/infographic-what-does-a-high-credit-scorer-look-like/" target="_blank">FICO® Score high achievers</a>,” where we examine the credit behavioural profiles of consumers with higher credit scores.</p> <p>As expected, our latest study showed that older people generally have higher scores, as has been the case in our <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/age-before-beauty-credit-worthiness-before-youth/" target="_blank">past research</a>. This is largely because they have trade lines that have been open longer, which leads to higher scores (assuming the trade lines are in good standing and all other things equal). The most credit savvy among you will remember that length of credit history accounts for roughly 15% of the overall <a href="http://www.myfico.com/CreditEducation/WhatsInYourScore.aspx" target="_blank">FICO® Score calculation</a>.</p> <p>But for younger consumers, it isn’t too helpful to say, “just wait until you are 50 years old, and that will fix things!” Thus, I decided to dive deeper with our analysis, including looking at the credit behavioural characteristics of younger consumers with high FICO® Scores.</p> <p>In this analysis, I looked at credit characteristics for the two highest score bands, 750-799 and 800-850, which have about 16% and 23% of the population, respectively. I further broke this down by looking at the characteristics of the youngest 15% in each group, which occurs at age 29 for the 750-799 group and 43 for the 800-850. We used FICO<strong>®</strong> Score 9 for our analysis, and examined typical variables of the categories that go into the make-up of the score.</p> <p><a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-29367" src="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png" alt="fico-score-high-achiever-table" width="715" height="747" /></a></p> <p>Since there’s a lot to dissect in this chart, I’ll highlight a few findings that struck me: <ul> <li><strong>Credit history.</strong> Higher scores are undoubtedly associated with a longer time on file. What’s striking is the higher average time on file for the 800+ group, both overall and for revolving accounts (the most common trade line). Clearly, it helps to start credit use early in life – but that’s not the sole determining factor for high scoring. The younger cohorts in both the 800+ and 750-799 groups have time on file medians significantly less than their older counterparts.</li> <li><strong>New credit.</strong> High credit scorers do, in fact, pursue new credit. We see little variation in months since last trade line opening and last inquiry among all groups observed.</li> <li><strong>Pay on time.</strong> As you might expect, the further in the past the delinquency, the higher the score – and that’s <u>if</u> a delinquency ever happened. 95% of the 800+ people and 72% of the 750-799 group have never been delinquent, which is a striking contrast to the 57% for the total population. The percentages for the younger groups are even higher, especially so for the 750-799ers. Collection items are also scarce for these high scorers. While 23% of the national population have collection items greater than $99, the figures are only 0.5% for the 800+ group and 3% for the 750-799 group. It is clear that, in conjunction with starting a credit file early, paying on time is a key trait of the FICO® Score high achiever.</li> <li><strong>Balance and utilization.</strong> Finally, we look at how credit is being used, focusing on revolving product use. (Since most people only have one mortgage or one auto loan, variation in instalment product figures is minimal and driven by payment history, which is near perfect for high scorers, as we’ve seen.) FICO® Score high achievers tend to have more open revolving accounts. While the % active trades and utilization are generally lower, by no means do high scorers avoid the use of credit products. What drives the difference here is the amount of <u>available</u> revolving credit utilized. The 800+ group is roughly 1/4 of the national median, both in total and on their highest utilized card; they also have lower balances and more cards<em>. </em>The 750-799 group is more active and higher utilized, but still only at 2/3 of the national figures. The young 750-799 group compensate with lower revolving balances and, as a result, lower utilization, which is in line with what we see for the 800+ group.</li> <li><strong>Benchmarks.</strong> I’d like to point out that while this study provides good benchmarks of the typical credit traits of the FICO® Score high achiever, individual credit profiles will vary widely. And keep in mind that when we sort groups of consumers as a whole by different behaviours, some results may look superficially odd. For example, the 800+ band has a longer median average open account time (128 months) than average revolving months on file (140 months).</li> </ul> So, what do we conclude? A huge takeaway is that high scorers don’t have too much in the way of serious delinquencies and negative public record data.</p> <p>In most respects, the young 800+ people are like their peer group. They really only differ markedly in their shorter credit history and higher non-mortgage balance, both of which are a function of life stage. Our results show that you don’t have to be a credit product hermit; these high scorers have more credit cards. The takeaway is to start credit activity early and maintain well-managed and moderate usage.</p> <p>In many ways, the young 750-799 people are more interesting because their age profile is much younger. Their credit characteristics differ more from their peer group, particularly in terms of length of credit history. They compensate by having almost pristine credit records and lower balances.</p> <p>Ultimately, 39% of US consumers are FICO® Score high achievers, which they accomplish by following common-sense credit practices. It ain’t rocket science!</p>
Read moreTake the next step
Connect with FICO for answers to all your product and solution questions. Interested in becoming a business partner? Contact us to learn more. We look forward to hearing from you.