5 Key Strategies to Prepare for New Fraud Trends
Fraudsters adapt rapidly, always on the lookout for new ways to exploit weaknesses in fraud defences and find new routes to their victims. How can fraud teams respond?
In recent years, focus has, understandably, been on addressing the rapid rise of authorised push payment (APP) fraud. In the background, however, there has been a resurgence in fraud types that many had thought were on the decline.
Recent data from UK Finance revealed that the number of card-not-present (CNP) fraud cases in the UK increased by 26% to just over 1.24 million in the first six months of 2024 (in comparison to same time last year). The gross loss value now sits at £193.7 million (growing 11% on H1 2023).
This continues to highlight how resilient, innovative and agile fraudsters are. Free of the constraints faced by legitimate organisations operating in the financial space, they can move quickly to exploit both new and old opportunities.
As fraud continues to move in multiple directions, there are some key strategies that financial institutions can and should implement now to be ready for changes in fraud patterns.
1. Watch Declining Fraud Types
Fraud patterns are cyclical and organisations shouldn’t forget this. When new controls are successfully implemented in one area and fraud levels begin to fall, it’s tempting to move resources over to growth areas. Fraudsters, however, will keep their fingers on every pulse, looking for new ways to breathe new life into old tactics.
This is evident with the recent resurgence of CNP fraud in the UK. It first emerged as a pressing issue with the growth of online shopping, and in 2019 strong customer authentication (SCA) was implemented widely with positive results. As a result, fraudsters found a new focus in the form of authorised push payment (APP) fraud or scams.
Although APP fraud had been around for a while, it suddenly boomed supercharged by Covid-19, economic downturns and technological advancement. Organisations and regulators across the globe turned their primary focus from detecting unauthorised payment activity to the detection of scams.
Meanwhile, criminals found ways to bypass the protections that have been put in place for CNP fraud, primarily by tricking consumers into sharing one-time passcodes (OTPs) through sophisticated social engineering tactics. This enabled them to facilitate a 3D-Secure transaction or register a card for an e-wallet, both of which tend to be seen as the more secure payment methods with less oversight once authenticated.
This is a stark reminder that fraudsters are constantly testing the system for weaknesses. A balanced fraud strategy must be maintained at all times, using data and trend analysis to help determine where resources should be allocated.
2. Break Down the Silos Between Fraud Teams
In many cases, there is still a lack of coordination between teams dealing with application fraud and those teams handling fraud further down the line. This fragmented approach creates huge gaps in the defence system.
For example, fraudsters manage to open accounts using stolen, synthetic or even their own identities. They manage those accounts in a similar manner to legitimate account holders. There is no reason to suspect anything untoward. Credit is built up until they have reached the maximum amount they can access, then they commit ‘bust-out’ fraud, taking the money and abandoning the account.
Removing those internal silos has to be a priority. Ideally, this should be achieved by consolidating decisioning across all stages into a single solution, with insights and decision outcomes visible and readily available for decisioning across the entire customer lifecycle. At the very least, organisations should ensure that teams share key knowledge and data from the different solutions that are in place. It’s only with a unified approach that emerging threats can be identified earlier. In the example above, by sharing key data from the ‘bust-out’ stage with those managing the originations process, trends or red flags can be identified much earlier in the process.
3. Learn from Trends Developing in Other Regions
Fraud trends are not limited by borders. While approaches to tackling fraud can vary significantly between countries, an uptick in a certain type in one country is a vital signal towards what might soon happen elsewhere.
For instance, the UK has been very active in its approach to tacking APP fraud with much progress from a regulatory perspective. However, as a byproduct it is also now experiencing a resurgence of CNP fraud as well as growth in abuse of false scam reimbursement cases. In countries where financial institutions have not yet seen a surge in this type of fraud, the UK’s experience is an important indicator and a learning can be taken from it. What steps can you take to better prepare defences against threats like resurgence of CNP fraud before those threats become reality?
4. Empower Internal Teams to Move Quickly
The return to CNP fraud has placed a spotlight on digital wallets - one of the faster growing payments methods with over half the world’s population expected to be using them by 2025. They have become a hot target for fraudsters.
Fraudsters are increasingly gaining access to digital wallets using phishing schemes or malware, or by adding stolen debit and credit cards to new wallets through social engineering techniques. This underlines the need for agility, and specifically the ability to spot threats and adapt quickly.
In order to gain the level of agility needed, there are a number of areas that organisations trying to manage this fraud need to consider.
The first is a flexible strategy. Many organisations have fraud detection rule sets that are so complex and rigid that they make it difficult to maintain and deploy new strategies. This inhibits the effectiveness and benefit of highly predictive analytical features provided by both third-party and internally developed models.
This also impacts the ability to onboard and access a variety of enhanced datasets from third-party suppliers. Though the integration of different datasets has consistently proven critical to fraud decisioning, it remains an extremely complex and lengthy process for many financial institutions.
Another key element to adapting and responding the moment threats are identified is the ability to make changes instantly. Many organisations today cite that due to lengthy IT processes they face a wait time of four to six months simply to implement a change to their data ingestion processes or their messaging in customer communication tools.
These are major barriers to being able to adapt and respond quickly. Without technology that enables teams to ingest data more efficiently, utilise analytical tools more effectively, or make changes quickly, financial institutions face significant risks.
5. The Power of Psychology in Communications
Fraudsters are master manipulators. They are adept at influencing customer behaviour, using social engineering tactics to convince individuals to hand over sensitive information. Sadly, this makes the customer the weakest link in the whole process.
This is where understanding both the psychology of fraudsters and their victims, and using effective customer communication, becomes key. It’s no longer enough to send generic verification requests. The communication must help people think twice before sharing personal information. The goal must be to break the fraudster’s spell and help your customer spot the red flags the scammer is trying to hide.
Tailored messaging and real-time prompts during suspicious activity and transactions will play a more valuable role in helping customers recognise potential scams. This means having the right tools that support personalised communication and bespoke treatment tailored to the threat at hand, reaching customers in the right way at the right time.
Anticipate, Adapt and Stay Connected
For financial institutions to be ready to move, they must remove the pitfalls of siloed thinking, choose technology that empowers internal teams and watch international neighbours for changes in fraud patterns and regulations.
A final point to remember is that fraudsters will always choose the path of least resistance. Currently, this sits alongside the customers themselves. Fraudsters are using psychology to exploit them when they are most vulnerable. It’s time financial institutions incorporated customer psychology into their messaging to remove this path and protect their customers from manipulation.
Learn More About Fighting Fraud
Popular Posts
Average U.S. FICO® Score at 716, Indicating Improvement in Consumer Credit Behaviors Despite Pandemic
The FICO Score is a broad-based, independent standard measure of credit risk
Read more
The GSE Data Is Public. Here's What It Shows About Credit Score Modernization.
Independent Milliman analysis of GSE historical data confirms what anyone can now verify directly: FICO® Score 10T is the most predictive score.
Read more
FICO® Score High Achievers: Is Age the Only Factor?
<p>FICO’s latest research on <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/us-credit-quality-rising-the-beat-goes-on/" target="_blank">national FICO® Score distribution</a> shows that US credit quality continues to trend upwards, with an increasing number of consumers scoring in the highest scores ranges. Given that, we decided it was time to refresh our study on “<a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/infographic-what-does-a-high-credit-scorer-look-like/" target="_blank">FICO® Score high achievers</a>,” where we examine the credit behavioural profiles of consumers with higher credit scores.</p> <p>As expected, our latest study showed that older people generally have higher scores, as has been the case in our <a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/risk-compliance/age-before-beauty-credit-worthiness-before-youth/" target="_blank">past research</a>. This is largely because they have trade lines that have been open longer, which leads to higher scores (assuming the trade lines are in good standing and all other things equal). The most credit savvy among you will remember that length of credit history accounts for roughly 15% of the overall <a href="http://www.myfico.com/CreditEducation/WhatsInYourScore.aspx" target="_blank">FICO® Score calculation</a>.</p> <p>But for younger consumers, it isn’t too helpful to say, “just wait until you are 50 years old, and that will fix things!” Thus, I decided to dive deeper with our analysis, including looking at the credit behavioural characteristics of younger consumers with high FICO® Scores.</p> <p>In this analysis, I looked at credit characteristics for the two highest score bands, 750-799 and 800-850, which have about 16% and 23% of the population, respectively. I further broke this down by looking at the characteristics of the youngest 15% in each group, which occurs at age 29 for the 750-799 group and 43 for the 800-850. We used FICO<strong>®</strong> Score 9 for our analysis, and examined typical variables of the categories that go into the make-up of the score.</p> <p><a href="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-29367" src="http://www.fico.com/en/blogs/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/FICO-Score-High-Achiever-table.png" alt="fico-score-high-achiever-table" width="715" height="747" /></a></p> <p>Since there’s a lot to dissect in this chart, I’ll highlight a few findings that struck me: <ul> <li><strong>Credit history.</strong> Higher scores are undoubtedly associated with a longer time on file. What’s striking is the higher average time on file for the 800+ group, both overall and for revolving accounts (the most common trade line). Clearly, it helps to start credit use early in life – but that’s not the sole determining factor for high scoring. The younger cohorts in both the 800+ and 750-799 groups have time on file medians significantly less than their older counterparts.</li> <li><strong>New credit.</strong> High credit scorers do, in fact, pursue new credit. We see little variation in months since last trade line opening and last inquiry among all groups observed.</li> <li><strong>Pay on time.</strong> As you might expect, the further in the past the delinquency, the higher the score – and that’s <u>if</u> a delinquency ever happened. 95% of the 800+ people and 72% of the 750-799 group have never been delinquent, which is a striking contrast to the 57% for the total population. The percentages for the younger groups are even higher, especially so for the 750-799ers. Collection items are also scarce for these high scorers. While 23% of the national population have collection items greater than $99, the figures are only 0.5% for the 800+ group and 3% for the 750-799 group. It is clear that, in conjunction with starting a credit file early, paying on time is a key trait of the FICO® Score high achiever.</li> <li><strong>Balance and utilization.</strong> Finally, we look at how credit is being used, focusing on revolving product use. (Since most people only have one mortgage or one auto loan, variation in instalment product figures is minimal and driven by payment history, which is near perfect for high scorers, as we’ve seen.) FICO® Score high achievers tend to have more open revolving accounts. While the % active trades and utilization are generally lower, by no means do high scorers avoid the use of credit products. What drives the difference here is the amount of <u>available</u> revolving credit utilized. The 800+ group is roughly 1/4 of the national median, both in total and on their highest utilized card; they also have lower balances and more cards<em>. </em>The 750-799 group is more active and higher utilized, but still only at 2/3 of the national figures. The young 750-799 group compensate with lower revolving balances and, as a result, lower utilization, which is in line with what we see for the 800+ group.</li> <li><strong>Benchmarks.</strong> I’d like to point out that while this study provides good benchmarks of the typical credit traits of the FICO® Score high achiever, individual credit profiles will vary widely. And keep in mind that when we sort groups of consumers as a whole by different behaviours, some results may look superficially odd. For example, the 800+ band has a longer median average open account time (128 months) than average revolving months on file (140 months).</li> </ul> So, what do we conclude? A huge takeaway is that high scorers don’t have too much in the way of serious delinquencies and negative public record data.</p> <p>In most respects, the young 800+ people are like their peer group. They really only differ markedly in their shorter credit history and higher non-mortgage balance, both of which are a function of life stage. Our results show that you don’t have to be a credit product hermit; these high scorers have more credit cards. The takeaway is to start credit activity early and maintain well-managed and moderate usage.</p> <p>In many ways, the young 750-799 people are more interesting because their age profile is much younger. Their credit characteristics differ more from their peer group, particularly in terms of length of credit history. They compensate by having almost pristine credit records and lower balances.</p> <p>Ultimately, 39% of US consumers are FICO® Score high achievers, which they accomplish by following common-sense credit practices. It ain’t rocket science!</p>
Read moreTake the next step
Connect with FICO for answers to all your product and solution questions. Interested in becoming a business partner? Contact us to learn more. We look forward to hearing from you.